AB0365 CLINICAL, LABORATORY AND IMAGING OUTCOMES IN TOCILIZUMAB-TREATED PATIENTS WITH LARGE VESSEL-GIANT CELL ARTERITIS ACCORDING TO EARLY ONSET THERAPY
Background: Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large vessel vasculitis (LVV)-Giant Cell Arteritis (LVV-GCA) (1-2 ). 18 F-fluodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) is useful to assess LVV disease activity (3-5 ). It is unknown if early treatment with TCZ may have an influe...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 80; no. Suppl 1; p. 1208 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.06.2021
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large vessel vasculitis (LVV)-Giant Cell Arteritis (LVV-GCA)
(1-2
).
18
F-fluodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (
18
F-FDG PET/CT) is useful to assess LVV disease activity
(3-5
). It is unknown if early treatment with TCZ may have an influence on clinical, laboratory and imaging outcomes.
Objectives:
To assess clinical, laboratory and PET/CT activity improvement in LVV-GCA patients treated with TCZ according to the time from disease diagnosis to TCZ onset.
Methods:
Comparative single-center study of 30 LVV-GCA patients treated with TCZ who were divided into 2 groups depending on the time of onset of TCZ:
a
) early onset (≤ 6 months; n=15) and
b
) late onset (> 6 months; n=15). All patients had a baseline and a follow-up PET/CT scan. Complete clinical improvement and normalization of laboratory markers (CRP ≤0.5mg/dL and/or ESR ≤ 20 mm/1
st
hour) was assessed. For imaging evaluation, normalization of total visual score (TVS) was considered when TVS = 0 and normalization of semiquantitative activity if the target to background ratio (TBR) at the thoracic aorta was <1.34.
Results:
30 patients were included (24 women/6 men); mean age 65.7± 9.8 years. Patients in the TCZ early-onset group were receiving higher doses of prednisone (10.0[5.9-15.0] vs 5.0 [5.0-7.5] mg/day; p< 0.01) and had higher TVS scores (7.0 [4.0-9.0] vs 3.0 [2.0-5.0]; p< 0.01) at baseline (Table 1). Following TCZ initiation, after a mean of 10.8±3.7 months, most patients achieved complete clinical improvement and normalization of ESR and CRP in both groups. Uncoupling with imaging outcomes was observed in both groups. Although non-significant statistical differences were observed, complete TBR normalization (TBR <1.34) and complete TVS normalization (TVS=0) tended to be more frequent in the group of patients who received early-onset TCZ therapy (Figure 1).
Table 1.
Early-onset TCZ therapy
(n= 15)
Late-onset TCZ therapy
(n=15)
p
General features
Age (years), mean ± SD
65.8 ± 9.9
65.5 ± 10.1
0.94
Sex (female), n (%)
11 (73.3)
13 (86.7)
0.65
GCA evolution before TCZ onset, median [IQR]
2.0 [1.0-5.0]
18.0 [9.0-34.0]
< 0.01
Laboratory
ESR (mm/1st hour), mean ± SD
34.7 ± 26.3
30.8 ± 28.7
0.70
CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]
1.1 [0.6-2.3]
0.8 [1.8 -2.5]
0.28
Prednisone dose (mg/day),
mean ± SD
10.0 [5.9-15.0]
5.0 [5.0-7.5]
0.01
TCZ therapy
Intravenous, n (%)
10 (66.7)
11(73.3)
0.99
Combined with MTX, n(%)
6 (40)
8 (53.3)
0.46
PET /CT activity
TBR at thoracic aorta
1.86 ± 0.69
1.54 ± 0.18
0.09
TVS
7.0 [4.0-9.0]
3.0 [2.0-5.0]
< 0.01
Complete clinical improvement, n (%
)
13 (86.7)
12 (80)
0.99
Normalization of ESR and CRP, n (%
)
15 (100)
15 (100)
0.99
PET/CT improvement
Complete TBR normalization
6 (40)
3 (20)
0.23
Complete TVS normalization
2 (13.3)
1 (6.7)
0.54
CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; TBR: target-to-background ratio. * Normalization of TBR was considered when TBR < 1.34. ** Normalization of TVS was considered when TVS=0.
Conclusion:
TCZ was effective in patients with LVV-GCA regardless the time from disease diagnosis to TCZ onset. However, complete normalization of vascular activity in PET/CT scans tended to occur more likely in patients who receive early-onset TCZ therapy within the first 6 months of the disease.
References:
[1]Calderón-Goercke M et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49:126-135. PMID: 30655091
[2]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020. PMID: 33253103
[3]González-Gay MA et al. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018; 14:593-605. PMID: 29877748
[4]Martínez-Rodríguez et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum.2018; 47(4): 530-537. PMID: 28967430
[5]Prieto-Peña D et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48:720-727. PMID: 28967430
Disclosure of Interests:
Diana Prieto-Peña Grant/research support from: UCB Pharma, Roche, Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie and Lilly, Isabel Martínez-Rodríguez: None declared, Belén Atienza-Mateo: None declared, Oriana Cuenca-Vera: None declared, Francisco Javier Gomez de la Fuente: None declared, Aida Sanchez-Salmón: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
DOI: | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1733 |