MODEL OF SCHOOL PRINCIPAL ACADEMIC SUPERVISION BASED ON LESSON STUDY

This paper analyzes the lesson study-based school principal academic supervision model to improve the pedagogical competence of teachers at SDN Cipanengah CBM Sukabumi by using a qualitative descriptive research method. The research was conducted by analyzing the stages of Plan, Do, and See. The res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJurnal pendidikan dan pengajaran Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 678 - 690
Main Authors Mulyana, Nana, Zein, Aang Abdulah, Mulyana, Rahmat, Rossa, Ade T Utty R, Rostini, Deti
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Laboratory of Elementary Teacher Education Study Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Riau Pekanbaru, Indonesia 26.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper analyzes the lesson study-based school principal academic supervision model to improve the pedagogical competence of teachers at SDN Cipanengah CBM Sukabumi by using a qualitative descriptive research method. The research was conducted by analyzing the stages of Plan, Do, and See. The research begins with interviews and field observations. Planning indicators are 1) identifying plans, 2) formulating objectives and output criteria, 3) compiling schedules, 4) reviewing instruments, 5) carrying out supervision, 6) carrying out supervision of learning outcome assessments, 7) analyzing results, 8) designing the provision of feedback, 9) preparing follow-up planning, and 10) preparing supervision reports. Indicators of implementation and observation are 1) reviewing device administration, 2) reviewing the implementation plan, 3) carrying out supervision, and 4) carrying out assessment supervision of learning outcomes. Indicators of reflection include 1) assessment supervision observation, 2) analysis, 3) academic supervision data analysis, and 4) follow-up. Management of academic supervision is indispensable to increasing teachers’ pedagogical competence. Based on the results of interviews and field observations, it is found that nearly 75.63% had sufficient criteria in making administration of learning tools and carrying out assessment activities.
ISSN:2580-8435
2614-1337
DOI:10.33578/pjr.v7i4.9455