AB0482 PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ENTHESITIS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE EFFICACY OF THE AVAILABLE OPTIONS
Background: Enthesitis is a recognized as a hallmark of spondyloarthrtis (SpA), including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, it is an underestimated disease domain in both in clinical trials and clinical practice (1). Objectives: This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the efficacy of the...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 80; no. Suppl 1; pp. 1268 - 1269 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.06.2021
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
Enthesitis is a recognized as a hallmark of spondyloarthrtis (SpA), including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, it is an underestimated disease domain in both in clinical trials and clinical practice (1).
Objectives:
This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the efficacy of the available pharmacological options for enthesitis.
Methods:
A SLR was conducted following the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Studies were sourced from PubMed and Embase databases, using the MeSH terms: enthesitis, entheses, treatment, spondylarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. The search was limited to articles in English published between January 2000 and July 2020. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts.
Results:
A total of 65 articles matched the research criteria. The included populations, the time to assessment of the primary endpoint and the chosen outcome for assessment of enthesitis was heterogeneous across studies. There were no studies assessing the effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, or csDMARDs. In PsA, all TNFis showed superiority in monotherapy against placebo (PBO). However, when combined with methotrexate (MTX), only some TNFi showed superiority against MTX monotherapy. In SpA, there was conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of TNFi in enthesitis. Regarding IL23i in PsA, Ustekinumab was superior to PBO, and to TNFis. Guselkumab was superior to PBO when given every 4 weeks. Regarding IL7i, Secukinumab (SEC) was superior to PBO, only for some dosing schemes. Ixekizumab (IXE) was superior to PBO for the treatment of enthesitis only in TNF-naïve patients. Studies comparing SEC and IXE to ADA, showed no difference. There was no reported data on IL17i for enthesitis in SpA. In PsA, Tofacitinib was superior to PBO in naïve patients, and Tofacitinib 10mg was superior to PBO in bioexperienced patients. Apresmilast 30mg showed superiority to PBO for enthesitis. All finding are summarized on Table 1.
Table 1.
Findings of the systematic literature review on treatment options for enthesitis
Disease
Tested drug vs Reference
Superiority of the treatment arm against reference arm (p<0.05
)
Reference
PsA
TNFi vs PBO
YES
NCT00051623 (IFX)
NCT00265096 (GOL)
NCT01087788 (CZP)
TNFi+MTX vs PBO+MTX
(PBO+ETN one study) vs PBO+MTX
NO
NCT00367237 (IFX)
NCT02065713 (GOL)
NCT02376790 (ETN)
UST vs PBO
YES
NCT01009086
NCT01077362
UST vs TNFi
YES
EudraCT 2017-003799-29 β
GUS q4w vs PBO
GUS q8w vs PBO
YES
NO
NCT03162796
NCT03158285
SEC (pooled dose) vs PBO
YES
NCT01392326
NCT01752634
SEC 300mg vs PBO
SEC 150mg vs PBO
YES
NO
NCT01989468
SEC 300mg with loading vs PBO
SEC 150mg with loading vs PBO
SEC 150mg no loading vs PBO
YES
YES
NO
NCT02404350
IXE vs PBO
ADA vs PBO
YES
NO
PsA Bionaive
NCT01695239
IXE vs PBO
NO
PsA Bioexperienced
NCT02349295
IL17i (SEC/ ADA) vs TNFi
NO
NCT02745080 (SEC)
NCT03151551 (ADA) β
APR 20mg vs PBO
APR 30mg vs PBO
NO
YES
NCT01172938
TOF 5mg vs PBO
TOF 10mg vs PBO
ADA 40mg vs PBO
NO
YES
NO
NCT01877668 (TNFi-naive)
TOF vs PBO
NO
NCT01882439 (TNFi-failure)
SpA
ETN vs SSZ
YES (imaging)/ NO (clinical)
axSpA
NCT00844142
ETN vs PBO
YES for nr-axSpA
NCT01258738
ADA vs PBO
YES for r-axSpA
NO for nr-axSpA
YES for perSpA
NCT00195819
NCT00939003
NCT01064856
GOL IV vs PBO
YES for r-axSpA
NCT02186873
GOL 100mg vs PBO
GOL 50mg vs PBO
YES
NO
For r-axSpA
NCT00265083
GOL vs PBO
YES nr-axSpA
NCT01453725
β-Open-label; PsA: Psoriatic arthritis; r-axSpA: Radiologic axial spondylarthritis; nr-axialSpA: non radiological axial spondylarthritis; PBO: Placebo; TNFi: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors; ETN: Etanercept; IFX: Infliximab; ADA: Adalimumab; GOL: Golimumab; UST: Ustekinumab; CZP: Certolizmab; GUS: Guselkumab; SEC: Secukinumab; IXE: Ixekizumab; APR: Apremilast; TOF: Tofacitinib; MTX - Methotrexate
Conclusion:
This SLR emphasizes the current heterogeneity in the assessment and report of enthesitis. There is still an unmet need for further studies to improve our understanding about enthesopathy.
References:
[1]Schett G. et al. Enthesitis: from pathophysiology to treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(12):731-41.
Disclosure of Interests:
Rita Pinheiro Torres: None declared., Santiago Rodrigues-Manica Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen and MSD, Fernando Pimentel dos Santos: None declared. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
DOI: | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.3681 |