Politics of Education

• Published in: Singapore pp. 295 - 322
• Main Author: Lee, Edwin Siew Cheng
• Format: Book Chapter Reference
• Language: English
• Published: Singapore Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 24.07.2008
• Subjects: History (general), world history; History - other areas; Chinese education; English-medium schools; Education for Living; English language; Lee Kuan Yew; education; Goh Keng Swee; Chinese Middle Schools; Singapore Malay Teachers' Union; Singapore Secondary School Principals' Association; pre-primary schools; Malay-medium schools falling enrolment; Singapore Chinese Middle School Teachers' Union; Sang Nila Utama Secondary School; bilingualism; Tamil-medium schools falling enrolment; Latif Taris; Ministry of Education; Singapore Chinese Teachers' Union; Ahmad Mattar; Singapore Chinese Schools' Conference; Ministry of Defence (MINDEF); Nanyang University; Umar Pulavar Tamil High School; Ho Kah Leong; All-Party Committee Report on Chinese education; General Certificate of Education "Ordinary" Level Examination; Primary School Leaving Examination; Language Exposure Time (LET); Malaysia Certificate of Education Examination; Chinese Secondary Four Examination; Wijeyasingha, Eugene; Chinese schools; Singapore Chinese Chamber; Goh Report on Ministry of Education; Teachers' Training College; Dhanabalan, S; schools; arrest of executives; Chinese; Literary, Debating and Dramatic Society; Special Assistance Plan (SAP) schools; Integration of schools factors militating against; Changkat Changi Secondary School; second language compulsory in all primary schools; Malay adoption as national language; Tamil schools restructuring

The economy, the army, and now education, were important pillars of nation-building under PAP rule. As democratic socialists, PAP leaders believed in education as a social good, and sought to bring it to as many as possible through promoting universal primary education and the expansion of secondary education. But the PAP Government did not begin on a clean slate. It had to deal with the system it inherited as a colonial legacy. At the same time, it had to carry out its own objectives. What it inherited were schools in four different languages, together with their attitudes, and in the case of Chinese-medium schools, entrenched suspicions and resistance to governmental interference. What it sought to create, with new principles in mind, was an education system that was responsive to the demands of industrial and business growth and modernization, and supportive of multiracial national integration. The pursuit of these objectives and principles brought in train consequences which were predictable to some extent, but the scale of these consequences, and the magnitude of the impact on key constituencies were not, and were overwhelming like a river at full flood.Once in power in 1959, the PAP endorsed the 1955 All-Party Committee Report on Chinese education, which laid down the principle of equal treatment for the four streams of schools, English, Chinese, Malay, and Tamil, in existence in the then British colony. This principle, as applied to Chinese-medium schools, meant that the school buildings and resources were upgraded, the teachers received training at the Teachers' Training College for the first time, several Chinese teachers' unions gained recognition, and the Ministry of Education started to appoint officials knowledgeable about Chinese education.The PAP Government also carried out the All-Party recommendation that the four streams of schools should use textbooks with a common content, but written in their respective languages. In 1960, it introduced a common examination at the primary level, the Primary School Leaving Examination, sat for by students of all four streams of schools.At the secondary level, the Chinese Middle Schools were restructured on the lines of the English-medium secondary schools, amid much controversy.