AB1030 PATIENT CARE AT THE FRACTURE LIAISON SERVICE REDUCE THE GAP IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN
Background Osteoporosis (OP) between men and women is different,and the way it is treated also differs. In men, the gap in clinical care, especially diagnosis and treatment, is worse. Objectives To analyze the differences in the clinical characteristics of OP (demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis,...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 81; no. Suppl 1; pp. 1638 - 1639 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.06.2022
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Osteoporosis (OP) between men and women is different,and the way it is treated also differs. In men, the gap in clinical care, especially diagnosis and treatment, is worse.
Objectives
To analyze the differences in the clinical characteristics of OP (demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis, and treatment) in an gold star Fracture Liaison Service (FLS).
Methods
Design: Observational, prospective, analytical study of usual clinical practice. All patients treated from an FLS from May 2018 to August 2021 were prospectively included. Of each patient, 160 clinical variables were introduced in a real time database, and they were followed for 2 years.
Results
557 patients were analyzed, 472 (83%) women and 100 (17%) men. The main features are summarized in the table. In women the vertebral fracture predominated followed by the hip fracture, in men the hip followed by the vertebral ones. Men had higher rates of smoking and alcoholism. The frequency of secondary OP and exercise was different between sexes. Weight, height, and BMI were different, due to different body composition. The frequency of specific treatment for OP (bisphosphonate, denosumab, teripatide, SERM) before fracture was very low, lower in men.
The most remarkable result was the low percentage of patients with OP receiving treatment before the FLS, and the differences between sex; 77 (16%) women versus 6 (6%) men had received it at some point in their lives, p=0.008. The probability of a man not receiving prior treatment was 2. 70 (95%CI 1.13- 7.81); p=0,008. After the FLS all the patients were treated. Treatment adherence in the first two years after the FLS was 84% in both sexes.
Conclusion
OP is different between women and men. The probability of not receiving treatment in men was higher among men, these differences disappeared after care in FLS.
Table 1
Variable
Hipn, %239, 43
Vertebraln, %159, 28
DERn, %96, 17
Humerusn, % 41, 7
Othern, % 37, 6
p
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
0.0001
Number
179, 75
60, 25
129, 81
30, 19
93, 97
3, 3
40, 98
1, 2
31, 84
6, 16
0.06
Current smoker
13, 8 *
19, 32
20, 16 *
14, 48
16, 17 *
1, 33
3, 8
0, 0
8,
1
0.3
Drinker >3 cups/day
5, 3 *
14, 24
9, 7 *
11, 38
6, 6
1, 33
2, 5
0, 0
2, 6
0
0.001
Secondary causes of OP
24, 16
10, 21
24, 22
14, 56
14, 18
0, 0
11, 32
0, 0
9, 32
1, 20
0,03
Exercise
0,0001
Bed to armchair
35, 28 *
12, 21
10, 8*
8, 28
1, 1
0, 0
3, 8
1, 3*
2, 33
Wanders at home
64, 0
13, 23
36, 30*
5, 17
7, 8
0, 0
5, 13
11, 38
1, 17
Walk in the street
58, 36
26, 46
53, 43
15, 52
59, 68
2, 67
25, 64
10, 34
3, 50
Daily exercise
4, 2
5, 9
22, 18
1, 3
20, 23
6, 15
7, 24
0, 0
Total
161, 74
56, 26
121, 81
29, 19
87, 97
1, 33 3, 3
39, 100
29, 82
6, 17
BMI ≥ 30
53, 32
14, 25
51, 43
13, 46
38, 43*
3, 7
17, 45
1, 5
9, 29
2, 40
0.01
OP treatment before FF
26, 15 *
2, 3
28, 23 *
3, 10 *
13, 15
0, 0
6, 16
0, 0
4, 14
1, 20
0,008
Re-fracture (one year)
11, 9
4, 8
6, 7
0, 0
5, 8
0, 0
2, 8
1, 100
0, 0
0, 0
0.9
Mean± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean± SD
Mean± SD
Age, Years
79±8.7*
75.5 ±10.3
70.4±9.0
69.3±10.0
69±9.2
73.6±6.5
71.3± 8.7*
76
68.6±11.3
82.6±8.3
0.6
Weight, Kg
65.3±14,3*
72.1±12.9
67.2±13.4
78.5±14.9
70.7±12.1
85.5±13.4
71.7±11.8
90
68.6±18.6*
77.7±19.4
0.00001
Size, m
1.5±0.06*
1.64±0.06
1.51±0.01
1.63±0.06
1.54±0.06
1.6±0.06
1.54 ±0.06
1,63
1.54±0.06*
1.61±0.09
0.00001
BMI
28.4 ±5.1*
26.7±4.1
29.2 ±6.3
29.1±4.8
29.9±5.4
33.2±2.6
30.1±4.9
33.8
28.9±6.7
29.4± 6.2
0,04
DER= distal end of radius, Others included ribs, tibia and fibula, distal end of femur. BMI Body mass index. *p value between women and men in each group of fragility fractures.
Disclosure of Interests
Blanca Hernández-Cruz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Stada, UCB, GebroPharma, Nordic, Consultant of: Abbvie, MSD, Lilly, Stada, UCB, Maria José Miranda García: None declared, Julia Barrera: None declared, Francisco Jesús Olmo Montes: None declared, María Angeles Vázquez Gómez: None declared, Mercedes Giner García: None declared, Miguel Angel Colmenero Camacho: None declared, José Javier Pérez Venegas: None declared, María José Montoya García: None declared |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
DOI: | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.4150 |