An oral TRPV 1 antagonist attenuates laser radiant‐heat‐evoked potentials and pain ratings from UV B ‐inflamed and normal skin

Aims Laser (radiant‐heat) evoked potentials ( LEP s) from vertex‐ EEG p eak‐to‐ p eak ( PtP ) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT ‐102, a novel TRPV 1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared with active controls and placebo in n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 75; no. 2; pp. 404 - 414
Main Authors Schaffler, Klaus, Reeh, Peter, Duan, W. Rachel, Best, Andrea E., Othman, Ahmed A., Faltynek, Connie R., Locke, Charles, Nothaft, Wolfram
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.02.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims Laser (radiant‐heat) evoked potentials ( LEP s) from vertex‐ EEG p eak‐to‐ p eak ( PtP ) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT ‐102, a novel TRPV 1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared with active controls and placebo in normal and UV B ‐inflamed skin. Methods This was a randomized, placebo‐ and active‐controlled, double‐blind, intra‐individual, crossover trial. Twenty‐four healthy subjects received six sequences of single doses of ABT ‐102 (0.5, 2, 6 mg), etoricoxib 90 mg, tramadol 100 mg and placebo. Painful stimuli were induced by CO 2 ‐laser on normal and UV B ‐inflamed skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale ( VAS ‐pain) ratings were taken at baseline and hourly up to 8 h post‐dose from both skin types. Results Compared with placebo, significant mean decreases in the primary variable of LEP PtP ‐amplitude from UV B ‐inflamed skin were observed with ABT ‐102 6 mg ( P < 0.001), ABT ‐102 2 mg ( P = 0.002), tramadol 100 mg ( P < 0.001), and etoricoxib 90 mg ( P = 0.001) over the 8 h period; ABT ‐102 0.5 mg was similar to placebo. ABT ‐102 6 mg was superior to active controls over the 8 h period ( P < 0.05) whereas ABT ‐102 2 mg was comparable. Improvements in VAS scores compared with placebo were observed with ABT ‐102 6 mg ( P < 0.001) and ABT ‐102 2 mg ( P = 0.002). ABT ‐102 average plasma concentrations were 1.3, 4.4 and 9.4 ng ml −1 for the 0.5, 2 and 6 mg doses, respectively. There were no clinically significant safety findings. Conclusions TRPV ‐1 antagonism appears promising in the management of clinical pain, but requires further investigation.
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04377.x