Crossing the line: Effect of border representation in perceptual dialectology
Abstract This study investigates the effect of differing representations of state boundaries on the draw-a-map task in perceptual dialectology in a region of the United States. The typical draw-a-map survey instrument represents state borders with solid lines. Would respondents react differently to...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of linguistic geography Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 67 - 75 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
01.10.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
This study investigates the effect of differing representations of state boundaries on the draw-a-map task in perceptual dialectology in a region of the United States. The typical draw-a-map survey instrument represents state borders with solid lines. Would respondents react differently to maps with dashed-line state borders? More specifically, would respondents draw more dialect areas that cross state lines on maps with dashed-line state borders versus solid-line state borders? These questions are explored through two datasets, and similarities and differences emerge. For example, respondents of both map types draw more single-state dialect areas than multistate dialect areas, and respondents with dashed-line maps draw more dialect areas on average than respondents with solid state maps. While dataset 1 showed a significant association between map type and multistate dialect area with respondents using dashed-line border maps drawing more multistate dialect areas than respondents with solid-line maps,
H
(1) = 5.13,
P
= .017, this association was not significant in dataset 2,
H
(1) = .06,
P
= .798. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2049-7547 2049-7547 |
DOI: | 10.1017/jlg.2022.3 |