Relationship between body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis of ER+ node negative breast cancer (BC) and Oncotype DX recurrence score

Abstract only 582 Background: Inferior stage-adjusted survival for BC among obese (O) women has been reported. This may reflect differences in treatment planned for O women, in treatment received (due to toxicity), or in tumor biology arising in different cellular environments, such as high serum in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 30; no. 15_suppl; p. 582
Main Authors Lohrisch, Caroline A., Davidson, Ashley, Chia, Stephen K. L., Gelmon, Karen A., Shenkier, Tamara Nina, Ellard, Susan, Woods, Ryan, Wong, Linda, Pope, Janice
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.05.2012
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only 582 Background: Inferior stage-adjusted survival for BC among obese (O) women has been reported. This may reflect differences in treatment planned for O women, in treatment received (due to toxicity), or in tumor biology arising in different cellular environments, such as high serum insulin levels, which are associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Methods: We examined whether overweight (BMI 25-30) or obese (BMI >30) women had a higher Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score (RS) after ER+, node negative (NN) or N0i+ BC than normal weight women. Included were all participants at the BC Cancer Agency in a RS clinical utility study in consecutive ER+ NN, N0i+ BC (n=156) at the BC Cancer Agency and in the TAILORx trial (n=56). Sixteen were excluded (n=5 withdrew consent; 1 triple negative; 3 test failed; 2 her2+; 1 neoadjuvant treatment, n=4 height and weight missing). Results: A similar proportion of O patients had low, intermediate, and high RS tumors. Cancers with a high RS were more likely to be grade 3 (55% of grade 3 tumours had high RS, 33% intermediate RS, 12% low RS) and fewer were strongly ER positive (69% of high RS versus 97% of intermediate and low RS). Conclusions: While this data does not support differences in tumor risk arising in O versus non obese environments in ER+, NN BC, examination of a larger data set may be more informative. [Table: see text]
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.582