787-P: Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being among Children with Diabetes Using Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: Findings from a Global Survey

Background: Open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have shown to be safe and effective in clinical and real-world studies and to increase quality of life (QoL) in adult users. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effect on health-related QoL and general wellbeing in children and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 71; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors KNOLL, CHRISTINE, BRAUNE, KATARINA, BALLHAUSEN, HANNE, SCHIPP, JASMINE, SKINNER, TIMOTHY C., WÄLDCHEN, MANDY, O'DONNELL, SHANE, GAJEWSKA, KATARZYNA A., CLEAL, BRYAN, RAILE, KLEMENS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York American Diabetes Association 01.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have shown to be safe and effective in clinical and real-world studies and to increase quality of life (QoL) in adult users. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effect on health-related QoL and general wellbeing in children and their caregivers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the QoL of children and adolescents with diabetes using open-source AID systems using validated measures. Method: In this cross-sectional, population-based global online survey we examined the caregiver-reported QoL and psychological well-being of users and non-users of open-source AID. Validated questionnaires assessed general emotional wellbeing (WHO-5 Well-being Index) , diabetes-specific QoL (Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey - Parent Revised version (PAID-PR) , Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL, diabetes module) and subjective sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)) . Results: In total 188 caregivers from 27 countries completed at least one questionnaire on behalf of their children, including 132 children with type 1 diabetes using open-source AID (mean age 11.5 (SD 3.5) , 48% female) and 56 children with type 1 diabetes who were non-users at the time of the survey (mean age 10.4 (SD 3.3) , 41% female) . All questionnaire scores showed significant between-group differences with the AID users reporting higher general (WHO-5: p<0.001) , diabetes-related (PAID: p=0.029; PedsQL: p=0.016) and sleep-related QoL (PSQI: p<0.001) . Discussion: The results show the beneficial impact that open-source AID systems have on the QoL and psychological well-being of children and adolescents, and can therefore help to inform academia, regulatory decision- and policymakers about the potential that open-source AID systems hold. Further research is needed to examine the reasons for the differences between the groups. Disclosure C.Knoll: None. K.Raile: Other Relationship; Dexcom, Inc. K.Braune: None. H.Ballhausen: None. J.Schipp: None. T.C.Skinner: None. M.Wäldchen: None. S.O'donnell: None. K.A.Gajewska: None. B.Cleal: None. Funding European Commission's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) (grant agreement number 823902)
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db22-787-P