Appropriateness of Initiating Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infection Among Nursing Home Residents

• Published in: Infection control and hospital epidemiology Vol. 41; no. S1; pp. s127 - s128
• Main Authors: Eure, Taniece R., Thompson, Nicola D., Penna, Austin, Bamberg, Wendy M., Barney, Grant, Barter, Devra, Clogher, Paula, DeSilva, Malini, Dumyati, Ghinwa, Epson, Erin, Felsen, Christina B., Frank, Linda, Godine, Deborah, Irizarry, Lourdes, Johnston, Helen, Kainer, Marion A., Li, Linda, Lynfield, Ruth, Mahoehney, JP, Nadle, Joelle, Ocampo, Valerie L. S., Ray, Susan M., Samper, Monika E., Davis, Sarah Shrum, Sievers, Marla, Srinivasan, Krithika, Wilson, Lucy E., Zhang, Alexia Y., Magill, Shelley S., Stone, Nimalie D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 01.10.2020
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Disease control; Documentation; Infectious diseases; Medical instruments; Medical records; Nursing homes; Urinary tract infections; Urogenital system
• ISSN: 0899-823X; 1559-6834
• DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.637

Background: Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in nursing homes; urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a frequent indication. Although there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of UTIs, various criteria have been developed to inform and standardize nursing home prescribing decisions, with the goal of reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Using different published criteria designed to guide decisions on initiating treatment of UTIs (ie, symptomatic, catheter-associated, and uncomplicated cystitis), our objective was to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing among NH residents. Methods: In 2017, the CDC Emerging Infections Program (EIP) performed a prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in 161 nursing homes from 10 states: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Tennessee. EIP staff reviewed resident medical records to collect demographic and clinical information, infection signs, symptoms, and diagnostic testing documented on the day an antibiotic was initiated and 6 days prior. We applied 4 criteria to determine whether initiation of treatment for UTI was supported: (1) the Loeb minimum clinical criteria (Loeb); (2) the Suspected UTI Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation tool (UTI SBAR tool); (3) adaptation of Infectious Diseases Society of America UTI treatment guidelines for nursing home residents (Crnich & Drinka); and (4) diagnostic criteria for uncomplicated cystitis (cystitis consensus) (Fig. 1). We calculated the percentage of residents for whom initiating UTI treatment was appropriate by these criteria. Results: Of 248 residents for whom UTI treatment was initiated in the nursing home, the median age was 79 years [IQR, 19], 63% were female, and 35% were admitted for postacute care. There was substantial variability in the percentage of residents with antibiotic initiation classified as appropriate by each of the criteria, ranging from 8% for the cystitis consensus, to 27% for Loeb, to 33% for the UTI SBAR tool, to 51% for Crnich and Drinka (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Appropriate initiation of UTI treatment among nursing home residents remained low regardless of criteria used. At best only half of antibiotic treatment met published prescribing criteria. Although insufficient documentation of infection signs, symptoms and testing may have contributed to the low percentages observed, adequate documentation in the medical record to support prescribing should be standard practice, as outlined in the CDC Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for nursing homes. Standardized UTI prescribing criteria should be incorporated into nursing home stewardship activities to improve the assessment and documentation of symptomatic UTI and to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use. Funding: None Disclosures: None