Onsite-Assessment of Infection Prevention Preparedness in Community Healthcare Settings

Background: Well-designed infection prevention programs include basic elements aimed at reducing the risk of transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. Although most acute-care facilities have robust infection prevention programs, data are sporadic and often lacking in other healthcar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInfection control and hospital epidemiology Vol. 41; no. S1; pp. s335 - s336
Main Authors Cook, Evelyn, Hernandez, Julie, Lamm, Wanda, Lewis, James, Powell, Amy, Ridge, Heather, Weber, David Jay, Rutala, William
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge Cambridge University Press 01.10.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0899-823X
1559-6834
DOI10.1017/ice.2020.942

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Well-designed infection prevention programs include basic elements aimed at reducing the risk of transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. Although most acute-care facilities have robust infection prevention programs, data are sporadic and often lacking in other healthcare settings. Infection control assessment tools were developed by the CDC to assist health departments in assessing infection prevention preparedness across a wide spectrum of health care including acute care, long-term care, outpatient care, and hemodialysis. Methods: The North Carolina Division of Public Health collaborated with the North Carolina Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology (SPICE) to conduct a targeted number of on-site assessments for each healthcare setting. Three experienced infection preventionists recruited facilities, conducted on-site assessments, provided detailed assessment findings, and developed educational resources. Results: The goal of 250 assessments was exceeded, with 277 on-site assessments completed across 75% of North Carolina counties (Table 1). Compliance with key observations varied by domain and type of care setting (Table 2). Conclusions: Comprehensive on-site assessments of infection prevention programs are an effective way to identify gaps or breaches in infection prevention practices. Gaps identified in acute care primarily related to competency validation: however, gaps presenting a threat to patient safety (ie, reuse of single dose vials, noncompliance with sterilization and/or high-level disinfection processes) were identified in other care settings. Infection control assessment and response findings underscore the need for ongoing assessment, education, and collaboration among all healthcare settings. Funding: None Disclosures: None
Bibliography:ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0899-823X
1559-6834
DOI:10.1017/ice.2020.942