Influence of heat and moisture exchanger use on measurements performed with manovacuometer and respirometer in healthy adults

Background: The use of evaluation tools such as the manovacuometer and respirometer is frequent and disinfection is usually limited to the external surfaces, which is insufficient and raises concerns because of the potential spread of infectious diseases. Hydrophobic heat and moisture exchangers (HM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine Vol. 11
Main Authors Jaber Lucato, Jeanette Janaina, Marraccini Nogueira da Cunha, Thiago, Solange Oliveira Costa Rocha, Sara, Palmieri de Carvalho, Fernanda Maria, Botega, Daniele Cristina, Anbar Torquato, Jamili, Gimenes, Ana Cristina, Fraga Righetti, Renato
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Italian
Published Pavia PAGEPress Publications 01.12.2016
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The use of evaluation tools such as the manovacuometer and respirometer is frequent and disinfection is usually limited to the external surfaces, which is insufficient and raises concerns because of the potential spread of infectious diseases. Hydrophobic heat and moisture exchangers (HME) are used in mechanical ventilation and have microbiological filters, which can possibly reduce contamination, increasing the safety of related procedures. It is unknown, however, if the addition of an exchanger affects the measurements obtained. Aim of this study was to verify if the use of an HME interferes in maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures assessed using the manovacuometer and vital capacity evaluated using the respirometer in healthy adults. Methods: A controlled transversal trial was carried out. Twenty healthy young adults were included in the study. Vital capacity by respirometer and, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) were assessed with and without the use of HME. Results: No significant difference was found between the values pre and post HME use in vital capacity measurements: (3878.8 ± 202.2 mL vs. 3925.5 ± 206.0 mL, p = 0.116) and the respiratory muscle strength measurements: MIP (−99.0 ± 8.9 vs −95.5 ± 9.0 cm H2O, p = 0.149) and MEP (92.5 ± 7.5 vs 92.5 ± 7.7 cm H2O, p = 1.0) respectively. Conclusion: We conclude that the use of HME does not modify the lung volumes or respiratory muscle strength, and can be used in order to reduce the occurrence of pulmonary infection.
ISSN:1828-695X
2049-6958
DOI:10.4081/mrm.2016.261