The effect of vision on walking in children with different levels of motor competency

Background: Motor coordination problems of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) have been frequently associated with poor visuospatial processing. Objective: The aim this study has been to investigate a role of the vision in the motor control of walking between typical developing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTělesná kultura (Olomouc) Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 40 - 47
Main Authors Nieto, Miriam Palomo, Psotta, Rudolf, Abdollahipour, Reza, Agricola, Adrian, Valtr, Ludvík
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Czech
Published Palacký University Olomouc 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Motor coordination problems of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) have been frequently associated with poor visuospatial processing. Objective: The aim this study has been to investigate a role of the vision in the motor control of walking between typical developing children (TD) and children at risk of DCD (DCDR). Methods: Participants included 16 TD (mean age 9.1, SD 1.0 years), and 16 DCDR, (mean age 8.7, SD 0.8 years) who walked along a 10 meter walkway using the Optojump instrument to assess the spatio-temporal variables of the gait pattern in full vision (FV) and non-vision (NV) conditions. Data was analyzed in a two-way mixed-effect ANOVA (2 groups - TD vs. DCDR, 2 visual conditions - FV vs. NV) with repeated measurement on the last factor (p ≤ .05). Results: The results demonstrated that DCDR children walked slower and with shorter steps than their TD peers. Also, withdrawing the vision affects some parameters of the gait cycle including the stance-phase, single-support, load-response and pre-swing regardless of the level of motor coordination of the children. Conclusions: A higher dependency on visual information or impaired utilization of proprioceptive inputs for execution of simple walk in the stable environment were not confirmed in the children with motor difficulties.
ISSN:1211-6521
1803-8360
DOI:10.5507/tk.2015.017