The current state of ethics in relation to patents
Patents are intended to incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights; however, in the biomedical sciences, they frequently intersect with ethical dilemmas involving public access, potential harms, and distributive justice. Legal frameworks, such as those in Korea and international t...
Saved in:
Published in | Science editing Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 225 - 230 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
한국과학학술지편집인협의회
01.08.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2288-8063 2288-7474 |
DOI | 10.6087/kcse.376 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Patents are intended to incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights; however, in the biomedical sciences, they frequently intersect with ethical dilemmas involving public access, potential harms, and distributive justice. Legal frameworks, such as those in Korea and international treaties, prohibit patents on inventions that violate public health or morality. Nevertheless, identifying ethical risks at the application stage remains challenging. High-profile controversies, such as gene patenting (e.g., BRCA1/2 and CRISPR-Cas9) and embryonic stem cell patents, highlight divergent national standards and ongoing debates regarding the public domain status of genetic information and the permissibility of inventions derived from embryonic research. Mechanisms like compulsory licensing, exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, attempt to balance exclusive rights with urgent public needs, but these approaches have limitations. Despite the increasing importance of these concerns, internationally unified ethical guidelines for researchers, journal editors, and policymakers are lacking. We recommend the development of clearer ethical standards and practical frameworks to help stakeholders address the moral complexities of biomedical patents and to support responsible innovation and equitable access to life-saving technologies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Patents are intended to incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights; however, in the biomedical sciences, they frequently intersect with ethical dilemmas involving public access, potential harms, and distributive justice. Legal frameworks, such as those in Korea and international treaties, prohibit patents on inventions that violate public health or morality. Nevertheless, identifying ethical risks at the application stage remains challenging. High-profile controversies, such as gene patenting (e.g., BRCA1/2 and CRISPR-Cas9) and embryonic stem cell patents, highlight divergent national standards and ongoing debates regarding the public domain status of genetic information and the permissibility of inventions derived from embryonic research. Mechanisms like compulsory licensing, exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, attempt to balance exclusive rights with urgent public needs, but these approaches have limitations. Despite the increasing importance of these concerns, internationally unified ethical guidelines for researchers, journal editors, and policymakers are lacking. We recommend the development of clearer ethical standards and practical frameworks to help stakeholders address the moral complexities of biomedical patents and to support responsible innovation and equitable access to life-saving technologies. Patents are intended to incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights; however, in the biomedical sciences, they frequently intersect with ethical dilemmas involving public access, potential harms, and distributive justice. Legal frameworks, such as those in Korea and international treaties, prohibit patents on inventions that violate public health or morality. Nevertheless, identifying ethical risks at the application stage remains challenging. High-profile controversies, such as gene patenting (e.g., BRCA1/2 and CRISPR-Cas9) and embryonic stem cell patents, highlight divergent national standards and ongoing debates regarding the public domain status of genetic information and the permissibility of inventions derived from embryonic research. Mechanisms like compulsory licensing, exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, attempt to balance exclusive rights with urgent public needs, but these approaches have limitations. Despite the increasing importance of these concerns, internationally unified ethical guidelines for researchers, journal editors, and policymakers are lacking. We recommend the development of clearer ethical standards and practical frameworks to help stakeholders address the moral complexities of biomedical patents and to support responsible innovation and equitable access to life-saving technologies. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
Author | Yoo, Jeong-Ju Kim, Seryeong |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Seryeong orcidid: 0009-0000-8320-900X surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Seryeong – sequence: 2 givenname: Jeong-Ju orcidid: 0000-0002-7802-0381 surname: Yoo fullname: Yoo, Jeong-Ju |
BackLink | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003232407$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNotkM1KAzEYRYNUsNaCj5ClCFOTzEx-lqVoLRQEGdchk36xcWpSkrjw7Z3aru6Fe7iLc4smIQZA6J6SBSdSPA02w6IW_ApNGZOyEo1oJpcuCa9v0DznL0II5Vy1nE8R6_aA7U9KEArOxRTA0WEoe28z9gEnOJjiY8Al4uO4hpLv0LUzhwzzS87Qx8tzt3qttm_rzWq5rSwljFdSOKmIZcCMhZ4a0VLpnOpJ07Q7AMUp6RUXRrUEzK5hQBV3koMFa1mv-nqGHs-_ITk9WK-j8f_5GfWQ9PK922hKRFOrVo3wwxm2KeacwOlj8t8m_Y6IPrnRJzd6dFP_AU0nV_g |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.07.005 10.1134/S0006297922080090 10.1093/jlb/lsu007 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013669 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015112 10.1093/bmb/ldx002 10.1080/14740338.2021.1991307 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.033 10.21775/cimb.026.103 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION ACYCR |
DOI | 10.6087/kcse.376 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 2288-7474 |
EndPage | 230 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10743959 10_6087_kcse_376 |
GroupedDBID | 5VS AAYXX ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ KQ8 M~E ACYCR IPNFZ RIG |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1026-87f890c2e2aceb1a7518ff9b0445dee9610b967a950ead42e196f86ececc2b9b3 |
ISSN | 2288-8063 |
IngestDate | Sat Aug 23 03:12:11 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 27 16:25:31 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1026-87f890c2e2aceb1a7518ff9b0445dee9610b967a950ead42e196f86ececc2b9b3 |
Notes | https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.376 |
ORCID | 0009-0000-8320-900X 0000-0002-7802-0381 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.escienceediting.org/upload/pdf/kcse-376.pdf |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10743959 crossref_primary_10_6087_kcse_376 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-8-1 2025-08 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2025 text: 2025-8-1 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Science editing |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 |
References | ref12 ref14 Lee (ref18) 2021 ref11 ref10 ref2 ref1 ref16 ref19 (ref6) 2006 ref8 ref7 ref9 (ref17) 1994 ref4 Jin (ref15) 2012 ref3 von der Ropp (ref5) Panis (ref13) 2013 |
References_xml | – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7 – volume-title: Guidelines for stem cell research and clinical translation [Internet] ident: ref16 – volume-title: [Technical examination guidelines by technology field] [Internet] ident: ref2 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.07.005 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1134/S0006297922080090 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsu007 – volume-title: [Background and implications of the debate on intellectual property rights waiver in response to COVID-19] year: 2021 ident: ref18 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013669 – volume-title: Patent Act [Internet] ident: ref1 – volume-title: Bioethics and patent law: the case of Myriad [Internet] ident: ref5 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015112 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx002 – start-page: 347 volume-title: Patents on inventions related to human embryonic stem cells: the morality clause after Brüstle v. Greenpeace year: 2013 ident: ref13 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1991307 – year: 2006 ident: ref6 – year: 1994 ident: ref17 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.033 – start-page: 27 volume-title: A bioethical study on the examination of biotechnology patent applications: focusing on the invention using human embryonic stem cells year: 2012 ident: ref15 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.21775/cimb.026.103 |
SSID | ssj0001669566 |
Score | 2.2993643 |
Snippet | Patents are intended to incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights; however, in the biomedical sciences, they frequently intersect with... |
SourceID | nrf crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Index Database |
StartPage | 225 |
SubjectTerms | 문헌정보학 |
Title | The current state of ethics in relation to patents |
URI | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003232407 |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Science Editing, 2025, 12(2), , pp.225-230 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV07T8MwELZoWWBAPEV5yQjWlNRJ3HhEiKp0YGqlMkWxa6OqUoJKOsCv5y5xHq06AEvanuRE8Vfffed7mJB77ck48D3PASquHF8a6cSGzRzZ06Kn-lrCksJsi1c-nPijaTCtj77Lq0sy2VXfW-tK_oMqyABXrJL9A7LVTUEA3wFfuALCcP01xso2WMorg5D66TyDva5TwWhAiv1Ty65NJRctlzWYr6w0YHF1vjIokS-d1uK3tIjRoMwZrZq7BSyoctWsUmEM5jB0rVLRtQzcCn9NK7IG-qyp4opCZWstWRFV2VTE3MWtjMFCfequ19_S63rDBlWZgeCT4NgIR0YwskV2GTgAbsNZznfPOAfHLj85sHyhorMwDn4oH7vGNVrJ0jSow_iQHFjOTx8LAI_Ijk6OyX6jE-QJYQAltVDSHEqaGlpASecJLaGkWUotlKdkMngePw0de5yFo4DFcbA7JhSuYprFCixkjAEvY4R0fT-YaS2AyErB-7EIXFjePtOgHE3ItYJVxqSQ3hlpJ2mizwk1MyAZUnuBwsC1ZLFvwlCG2FvO4wGTHXJbvnj0UXQtiTZntkPuYEbg5zzCFuP4-Z5Gi2UEjtRLhHm6ngjExS_udEn26r_aFWlny5W-BqqWyZsctR_K0D-5 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+current+state+of+ethics+in+relation+to+patents&rft.jtitle=Science+editing&rft.au=Kim%2C+Seryeong&rft.au=Yoo%2C+Jeong-Ju&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.issn=2288-8063&rft.eissn=2288-7474&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=230&rft_id=info:doi/10.6087%2Fkcse.376&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_6087_kcse_376 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon |