The current state of ethics in relation to patents

Patents are intended to incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights; however, in the biomedical sciences, they frequently intersect with ethical dilemmas involving public access, potential harms, and distributive justice. Legal frameworks, such as those in Korea and international t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience editing Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 225 - 230
Main Authors Kim, Seryeong, Yoo, Jeong-Ju
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 01.08.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2288-8063
2288-7474
DOI10.6087/kcse.376

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Patents are intended to incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights; however, in the biomedical sciences, they frequently intersect with ethical dilemmas involving public access, potential harms, and distributive justice. Legal frameworks, such as those in Korea and international treaties, prohibit patents on inventions that violate public health or morality. Nevertheless, identifying ethical risks at the application stage remains challenging. High-profile controversies, such as gene patenting (e.g., BRCA1/2 and CRISPR-Cas9) and embryonic stem cell patents, highlight divergent national standards and ongoing debates regarding the public domain status of genetic information and the permissibility of inventions derived from embryonic research. Mechanisms like compulsory licensing, exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, attempt to balance exclusive rights with urgent public needs, but these approaches have limitations. Despite the increasing importance of these concerns, internationally unified ethical guidelines for researchers, journal editors, and policymakers are lacking. We recommend the development of clearer ethical standards and practical frameworks to help stakeholders address the moral complexities of biomedical patents and to support responsible innovation and equitable access to life-saving technologies.
Bibliography:https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.376
ISSN:2288-8063
2288-7474
DOI:10.6087/kcse.376