Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk

Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic varia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention pp. OF1 - OF10
Main Authors Kalia, Sarah S, Boddicker, Nicholas J, Yadav, Siddhartha, Huang, Hongyan, Na, Jie, Hu, Chunling, Ambrosone, Christine B, Yao, Song, Haiman, Christopher A, Chen, Fei, John, Esther M, Kurian, Allison W, Guo, Boya, Lindström, Sara, Auer, Paul, Lacey, James V, Neuhausen, Susan L, Martinez, Maria Elena, Sandler, Dale P, O'Brien, Katie M, Taylor, Jack A, Teras, Lauren R, Hodge, James M, Lori, Adriana, Bodelon, Clara, Trentham-Dietz, Amy, Burnside, Elizabeth S, Vachon, Celine M, Winham, Stacey J, Goldgar, David E, Domchek, Susan M, Nathanson, Katherine L, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Couch, Fergus J, Kraft, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 11.09.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1055-9965
1538-7755
1538-7755
DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0594