Glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver‐related mortality in patients with diabetes

• Published in: Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
• Main Authors: Mao, Xianhua, Cheung, Ka‐Shing, Tan, Jing‐Tong, Mak, Lung‐Yi, Lee, Chi‐Ho, Chiang, Chi‐Leung, Cheng, Ho‐Ming, Hui, Rex Wan‐Hin, Leung, Wai K., Yuen, Man‐Fung, Seto, Wai‐Kay
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 10.09.2024
• ISSN: 0269-2813; 1365-2036; 1365-2036
• DOI: 10.1111/apt.18254

Summary Background Optimal glycaemic control has well‐established health benefits in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). It is uncertain whether optimal glycaemic control can benefit liver‐related outcomes. Aims To examine the association of optimal glycaemic control with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver‐related mortality. Methods In a population‐based cohort, we identified patients with newly diagnosed DM between 2001 and 2016 in Hong Kong. Optimal glycaemic control was defined as mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% during the 3‐year lead‐in period after DM diagnosis. By applying propensity score matching to balance covariates, we analysed glycaemic control via competing risk models with outcomes of interest being HCC and liver‐related mortality. Results We identified 146,430 patients (52.2% males, mean age 61.4 ± 11.8 years). During a median follow‐up duration of 7.0 years, 1099 (0.8%) and 978 (0.7%) patients developed HCC and liver‐related deaths. Optimal glycaemic control, when compared to suboptimal glycaemic control, was associated with reduced risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.79). The risk of HCC increased with incremental HbA1c increases beyond >7% (SHR 1.29–1.71). Significant associations with HCC were also found irrespective of age (SHR 0.54–0.80), sex (SHR 0.68–0.69), BMI <25 or ≥25 kg/m 2 (SHR 0.63–0.75), smoking (SHR 0.61–0.72), hepatic steatosis (SHR 0.67–0.68) and aspirin/statin/metformin use (SHR 0.67–0.75). A lower risk of liver‐related mortality in relation to optimal glycaemic control was also observed (SHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.80). Conclusions Glycaemic control is an independent risk factor for HCC and liver‐related mortality, and should be incorporated into oncoprotective strategies in the general DM population.