Paraíso prohibido. Imágenes dialécticas en la construcción del Estado del Interior

The dominant state of the 20th century in Colombia was the result of the political process lived during the 19th century. This one sought to assimilate but to attenuate, the modern ideology that was taking place in the international context. In order to accomplish this, Colombian politicians develop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista Ciencias y Humanidades Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 115 - 133
Main Author Londoño, Fernando
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Corporación Educativa Jorge Robledo 10.01.2025
Subjects
crítica de arte
hegemonía
liberalismo
medios masivos
modernidad
siglo xx
violencia
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The dominant state of the 20th century in Colombia was the result of the political process lived during the 19th century. This one sought to assimilate but to attenuate, the modern ideology that was taking place in the international context. In order to accomplish this, Colombian politicians developed a double speech about Colombian identity: a “modern” foreign policy and an internal policy with rural and semi feudal features. Artists and intellectual people, felt and represented in their works the consequences of this paradox. El tipo de Estado dominante en Colombia en el siglo XX resultante del proceso político del siglo XIX, buscó asimilar, atenuando, la ideología de la modernidad que se iba gestando en el contexto internacional, para lo cual fomentaron un doble discurso sobre la identidad colombiana: una política externa “moderna” y una política interna de rasgos rurales y semifeudales. Artistas e intelectuales sintieron y representaron las consecuencias de esa paradoja.
ISSN:2462-9367
2500-784X
DOI:10.61497/93ktsy48