Validation of an indoor real-time location system for tracking sheep

• Published in: Computers and electronics in agriculture Vol. 227; p. 109535
• Main Authors: Woods, Jocelyn M., Adcock, Sarah J.J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.12.2024
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Positioning accuracy; Precision livestock farming; Sensors; Ultra-wideband; Ultra-wideband; Positioning accuracy; Sensors; Animal behavior; Precision livestock farming
• ISSN: 0168-1699
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109535

[Display omitted] •Robust validation of real-time location systems includes static and dynamic tests.•Static and dynamic error of an ultra-wideband real-time location system was <1 m.•Distances traveled were positively correlated with ground truth but overestimated.•Real-time location systems can be used to monitor ewe and lamb spatial patterns. Precision livestock technologies such as remote sensors are increasingly used to monitor the health, behavior, and welfare of livestock. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a commercially available ultra-wideband real-time location system (UWB RTLS) for tracking the 2D spatial locations and distances traveled by meat-breed ewes and lambs in an indoor barn. First, we assessed static performance by attaching the sensors to stationary posts and arranging them in a 1 × 1 m grid throughout the barn (29.0 × 11.8 m) for a total of 285 locations. At each post location, the sensors were placed at approximate ewe (0.9 m) and lamb (0.3 m) wither height. The precise 2D locations of each post were recorded using a laser tape measurer and used as the ground truth for comparison to the RTLS’ recorded x and y coordinates. Secondly, we conducted a dynamic validation test to evaluate the positional error and percent error of distances traveled while the sensors were worn by six free-roaming ewes and their singleton lambs. The ground truth locations of each sheep were recorded from video frames every second over 15 min and compared to the RTLS data. Overall static and dynamic error was 0.39 ± 0.20 m (mean ± SD) and 0.53 ± 0.31 m, respectively. Static error was lower in sensors positioned at lamb height than at ewe height, but the opposite pattern was true for dynamic error. Error was higher in pens further from the master anchor. Ground truth and RTLS distances traveled were positively correlated but the RTLS overestimated distances by 54 % on average. In conclusion, the UWB RTLS can acquire precise location estimates that are suitable for a range of scientific and practical applications, but distance estimates should be adjusted to account for overestimation.