What Do Rheumatology Residents Think of Their Training? A Survey of the National Rheumatology Commission

The National Commission of Rheumatology has developed a satisfaction survey for residents concerning their training period. 37% of the 176 invited to participate answered the survey. 71% said they were satisfied or very satisfied with the influence of the assistance activities during their training....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReumatología clinica (Barcelona) Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 27 - 30
Main Authors Andreu, José Luis, García Castro, Marta, Usón, Jacqueline, Jover, Juan Ángel, Millán, Isabel, Cáliz, Rafael, De Toro, Javier, Díaz, Federico, Guañabens, Nuria, Olivé, Alejandro, Talaverano, Sigrid, Trujillo, Elisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier España 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The National Commission of Rheumatology has developed a satisfaction survey for residents concerning their training period. 37% of the 176 invited to participate answered the survey. 71% said they were satisfied or very satisfied with the influence of the assistance activities during their training. 38% were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with supervision by staff. 39% were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their training in polarized light microscopy. 52% said no regular meetings were structured to monitor their training. 66% said that there had been no effective evaluation of their training. 39% were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied on the tools they were given to publish at their teaching unit. Overall satisfaction on classroom training for residents of Rheumatology is high. There are opportunities for improvement relating to training in certain techniques, monitoring and evaluation of the training period and training in research skills. La Comisión Nacional de Reumatología ha elaborado una encuesta sobre la satisfacción de los residentes respecto a su periodo formativo. Contestaron un 37% de los 176 invitados a participar. Un 71% manifestó que estaba satisfecho o muy satisfecho de la influencia de la actividad asistencial en su formación. El 38% estaba insatisfecho o muy insatisfecho de la supervisión por parte de la plantilla. El 39% estaba insatisfecho o muy insatisfecho del adiestramiento en microscopía de luz polarizada. El 52% contestó que no existían reuniones periódicas estructuradas de monitorización de su formación. El 66% declaró que no había existido ningún tipo de evaluación efectiva de su formación. El 39% se mostró insatisfecho o muy insatisfecho respecto a las facilidades para publicar que le brindó su unidad docente. La satisfacción global sobre la formación asistencial de los residentes de reumatología es elevada. Existen oportunidades de mejora referentes al entrenamiento en determinadas técnicas, la monitorización y evaluación del periodo formativo y la formación en habilidades de investigación.
ISSN:2173-5743
2173-5743
DOI:10.1016/j.reumae.2011.10.003