The widespread misconception about the Japanese major biogeographic boundary, the Watase line (Tokara gap), revealed by bibliographic and beta diversity analyses

• Published in: bioRxiv
• Main Authors: Komaki, Shohei, Igawa, Takeshi
• Format: Paper
• Language: English
• Published: Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 10.09.2017; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
• Edition: 1.1
• Subjects: Archipelagoes; Biogeography; Ecology; Island biogeography; Islands; avifauna; herpetofauna; Tokara Archipelago; flora; insect fauna; land-snail fauna; island biogeography; Ryukyu Archipelago
• ISSN: 2692-8205; 2692-8205
• DOI: 10.1101/186775

The biota of the Japanese Archipelago is divided into the Palearctic and Oriental realms by the Watase line (Tokara gap), a major biogeographic boundary of Japan. This boundary is generally placed between Akusekijima and Kodakarajima Islands of the Tokara Archipelago, and has been the subject of many biogeographic debates. However, despite being widely accepted, the position of the boundary is doubtful because of a lack of clear evidence. Here, to verify the definition and existence of the biogeographic boundary, we performed a documentary search and beta diversity analysis of multiple taxa. Our documentary search suggested that the Watase line (Tokara gap) should be put between Yakushima/Tanegashima and Amamioshima Islands, but recent references to it clearly deviate from its original definition, and that the placement of the boundary line between Akusekijima and Kodakarajima Islands is based on limited and biased evidence. Our beta diversity analyses found no common biogeographic boundary dividing the Tokara Archipelago into two realms, and showed that the beta diversity pattern of this region is explained by the areas and geographic distances of the islands in agreement with the general principles of island biogeography. The widespread misunderstanding of biogeography in this region could have been perpetuated by preconception and the citation of references without verification. Our study proposes that revision of the biogeography in the Tokara Archipelago, a gap region between the Palearctic and Oriental realms, is necessary and demonstrates the negative influence of preconception in biogeographic debate.