Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports
Abstract Objective: To receive and collate reports of death or major complications of transfusion of blood or components. Design: Haematologists were invited confidentially to report deaths and major complications after blood transfusion during October 1996 to September 1998. Setting: Hospitals in U...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ Vol. 319; no. 7201; pp. 16 - 19 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
03.07.1999
British Medical Association BMJ Publishing Group Ltd BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group British Medical Journal |
Edition | International edition |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective: To receive and collate reports of death or major complications of transfusion of blood or components. Design: Haematologists were invited confidentially to report deaths and major complications after blood transfusion during October 1996 to September 1998. Setting: Hospitals in United Kingdom and Ireland. Subjects: Patients who died or experienced serious complications, as defined below, associated with transfusion of red cells, platelets, fresh frozen plasma, or cryoprecipitate. Main outcome measures: Death, “wrong” blood transfused to patient, acute and delayed transfusion reactions, transfusion related acute lung injury, transfusion associated graft versus host disease, post-transfusion purpura, and infection transmitted by transfusion. Circumstances relating to these cases and relative frequency of complications. Results: Over 24 months, 366 cases were reported, of which 191 (52%) were “wrong blood to patient” episodes. Analysis of these revealed multiple errors of identification, often beginning when blood was collected from the blood bank. There were 22 deaths from all causes, including three from ABO incompatibility. There were 12 infections: four bacterial (one fatal), seven viral, and one fatal case of malaria. During the second 12 months, 164/424 hospitals (39%) submitted a “nil to report” return. Conclusions: Transfusion is now extremely safe, but vigilance is needed to ensure correct identification of blood and patient. Staff education should include awareness of ABO incompatibility and bacterial contamination as causes of life threatening reactions to blood. Key messages Blood transfusion, while extremely safe, has several potentially fatal hazards All staff handling blood should be aware of the importance of correct identity of sample, patient, and blood bag at all stages Resources should be directed to evaluation of methods for improving identification of patients Acute fever or collapse during or after transfusion may be due to ABO incompatibility or bacterial contamination Microbiological complications of transfusion accounted for a minor component of all reports |
---|---|
Bibliography: | local:bmj;319/7201/16 Correspondence to: L M Williamson istex:6B10F28C251830E054DC04C78BC666FA9BA0F1B9 PMID:10390452 href:bmj-319-16.pdf ark:/67375/NVC-WSBJZ5L8-2 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 Contributors: LMW, EML, PS, and JAJB took part in the establishment of the SHOT scheme, design of the questionnaire, analysis of data, and compilation of the report. SL, HC, and KS took part in design of the questionnaire, analysis of data, and compilation of the report. DBLMcC took part in the establishment of the SHOT scheme, analysis of data, and compilation of the report. LMW, HC, and EML are the guarantors. Correspondence to: L M Williamson lorna.williamson@nbs.nhs.uk |
ISSN: | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.16 |