Local civil society regimes: liberal, corporatist and social democratic civil society regimes in Swedish metropolitan cities

Academic debates on the role and position of civil society organisations (CSOs) in welfare states largely refer to policies and practices outlined at the national level. They therefore fail to recognise variations within nations. Based on a comparative case study of three Swedish metropolitan cities...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVoluntary sector review Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 3 - 20
Main Authors Arvidson, Malin, Johansson, Håkan, Johansson, Staffan, Nordfeldt, Marie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Manchester Policy Press 01.03.2018
The Policy Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Academic debates on the role and position of civil society organisations (CSOs) in welfare states largely refer to policies and practices outlined at the national level. They therefore fail to recognise variations within nations. Based on a comparative case study of three Swedish metropolitan cities, this article illustrates the importance of local, contextualised analyses. Through the concept of local civil society regimes, the study identifies three regime types, namely liberal, corporatist and social democratic. The key distinguishing factor between them relates to their different ideological positions regarding the role of CSOs in the marketisation and privatisation of public social welfare represented at the local level. The article argues for the need for further analysis to explore the implications of decentralisation from the perspective of local CSOs and their constituencies.
Bibliography:2040-8056(20180331)9:1L.3;1-
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2040-8056
2040-8064
2040-8064
DOI:10.1332/204080518X15199961331635