Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

It is controversial that whether sleeve lobectomy (SL) should be promoted more worthy than pneumonectomy (PN) in suitable patients. We searched all studies that had been published in English from PUBMED and Embase which compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of SL and pneumonectomy (PN) in p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgical oncology Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 265
Main Authors Shi, Woda, Zhang, Wei, Sun, Haoliang, Shao, Yongfeng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 11.12.2012
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is controversial that whether sleeve lobectomy (SL) should be promoted more worthy than pneumonectomy (PN) in suitable patients. We searched all studies that had been published in English from PUBMED and Embase which compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of SL and pneumonectomy (PN) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nineteen studies met our criteria with a combined total of 3878 subjects, of which 1316 (33.9%) underwent SL and 2562 (66.1%) underwent PN. The odds ratio was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.34-0.72) for postoperative mortality, 1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for postoperative complications, 0.78 (95% CI: 0.47-1.29) for locoregional recurrences. The risk difference for 1-, 3-, 5- year was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.07-0.14), 0.15 (95% CI: 0.06-0.24), 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09-0.20),respectively. The pooled hazard ratio was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56-0.71) in favor of SL group. SL is more worthy to be done than PN in suitable patients with less mortality and better long-term survival.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1477-7819
1477-7819
DOI:10.1186/1477-7819-10-265