P237 EUS guided liver biopsy; two is better than one

IntroductionLive biopsy remains the gold standard once less invasive methods in the diagnostic pathway of liver disease are non-diagnostic. EUS guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is increasingly seen as a viable alternative to percutaneous or trans-jugular biopsies. We sought to assess the suitability for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 72; no. Suppl 2; p. A175
Main Authors Ahmed, Wafaa, Paranandi, Bharat, Everett, Simon, On, Wei, Huggett, Matthew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 18.06.2023
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:IntroductionLive biopsy remains the gold standard once less invasive methods in the diagnostic pathway of liver disease are non-diagnostic. EUS guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is increasingly seen as a viable alternative to percutaneous or trans-jugular biopsies. We sought to assess the suitability for histological diagnosis and identify factors associated with non-diagnostic samples.MethodsA prospective database of consecutive patients who underwent EUS guided liver biopsy from September 2020 to December 2022 was retrospectively analysed.ResultsTwelve patients (7 female; 5 male) were identified. Median age was 52 years (range 23- 81). Indication for EUS-LB was deranged liver function tests (LFT) (n=11, 92%) or biliary pain with normal LFT in the context of positive autoantibodies (n=1, 8%). In addition to raised liver enzymes; 7 (58%) had biliary pain and 3 (25%) had biliary dilatation. Five (42%) patients had positive autoantibodies; smooth muscle antibodies in 3 (25%), anti-mitochondrial antibody in 1 (8%) and anti-LC1 in 1 (8%). Two (16%) had a radiological diagnosis of cirrhosis. There was one (8%) patient with a previous liver transplant. The preprocedural median bilirubin was 23 μmol/L (range 5–80 μmol/L), alanine aminotransferase 157 IU/L (range 13–642 IU/L) and alkaline phosphatase 141 IU/L (range 57–306 IU/L).A 19-gauge Franseen needle (Acquire, Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, Massachusetts, United States) was used in all cases. Two passes were taken from the right and 2 from the left lobe of the liver in 10 cases (83%). Median number of portal tracts was 30 (range 8- 103). The median specimen length was 20mm (range 15–31mm). Adequate specimen for a definitive histological diagnosis was available for 11 (92%) patients. The patient without sufficient tissue for histological diagnosis had 2 passes into the left liver lobe alone, 8 portal tracts were retrieved.Three (25%) patients were found to have no evidence of parenchymal liver disease. Three (25%) had minor changes of uncertain significance. One patient had non-specific cholestatic changes and was found to have a common bile duct stone on further investigation. One patient each had drug induced liver injury, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, chronic ductopenia and cystic fibrosis associated changes. One (8%) patient developed periprocedural pain which recovered with simple analgesia. There were no other complications.ConclusionsEUS guided liver biopsy is a safe and effective method of tissue acquisition. Two passes of both lobes of the liver should be taken. A full PB examination should be undertaken prior to performing liver biopsy to rule out other causes of deranged LFTs including biliary stones.
Bibliography:BSG LIVE’23, 19–22 June, ACC Liverpool
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-BSG.305