Comparison between anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia using functional magnetic resonance imaging

AIMS To assess calcarine activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in patients with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. METHODS 14 amblyopes (eight anisometropic and six strabismic) were studied with fMRI using stimuli of checkerboards of various checker sizes and temporal fre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 85; no. 9; pp. 1052 - 1056
Main Authors Choi, Mi Young, Lee, Kyoung-Min, Hwang, Jeong-Min, Choi, Dong Gyu, Lee, Dong Soo, Park, Ki Ho, Yu, Young Suk
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.09.2001
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIMS To assess calcarine activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in patients with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. METHODS 14 amblyopes (eight anisometropic and six strabismic) were studied with fMRI using stimuli of checkerboards of various checker sizes and temporal frequencies. While T2* weighted MRI were obtained every 3 seconds for 6 minutes, patients viewed the stimuli monocularly with either the amblyopic or sound eye. RESULTS Amblyopic eyes showed reduced calcarine activation compared with contralateral sound eyes in fMRI in all subjects. The calcarine activation from amblyopic eyes in anisometropic amblyopes was more suppressed at higher spatial frequencies, while that from amblyopic eyes in strabismic amblyopes was more suppressed at lower spatial frequencies. CONCLUSION These results suggest that fMRI is a useful tool for the study of amblyopia in humans. The calcarine activation via amblyopic eyes because of anisometropia or strabismus has different temporospatial characteristics, which suggests differences in the neurophysiological mechanisms between two types of amblyopia.
Bibliography:href:bjophthalmol-85-1052.pdf
PMID:11520755
ark:/67375/NVC-F3M3J39C-H
local:bjophthalmol;85/9/1052
istex:78F7559FEEC6595DF0E3D054F8B458705AB7C5BC
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.85.9.1052