Toxicity profiles of traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis

Background: The progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be retarded or halted by disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Next to inefficacy, toxicity limits their use. Objective: To explore the toxicity profiles of DMARDs in daily life. Patients and methods: Five hundred and ninety thre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 62; no. 5; pp. 482 - 486
Main Authors Aletaha, D, Kapral, T, Smolen, J S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.05.2003
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be retarded or halted by disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Next to inefficacy, toxicity limits their use. Objective: To explore the toxicity profiles of DMARDs in daily life. Patients and methods: Five hundred and ninety three patients with RA charts (>2300 patient years of treatment) were reviewed at two rheumatology outpatient clinics. All recorded data on toxicity and reasons for stopping treatment were collected. Results: Adverse events were common reasons for treatment discontinuation (42% of treatments). In 70% they were subjectively reported at the clinical visit, while substantial laboratory abnormalities were seen relatively rarely (9% of treatments: abnormal liver function tests in 5%; haematological abnormalities in 3%; impaired renal function in 1%). No single case of retinopathy from antimalarial drugs (that is, an incidence of <0.3 events/1000 patient years) was found, although eye examinations by the specialists were abnormal 30 times per 1000 patient years, mostly revealing keratopathy. Most commonly reported symptoms per 1000 patient years were nausea (54 events), abdominal pain (37 events), and rashes (34 events). Adverse events were more likely to occur with increasing number of consecutive DMARD courses. Conclusion: The first DMARD course in a patient seems to be safer than the consecutive ones. In addition, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) seems to be similar for high and low dose treatment. Data are also provided on types and incidence of AEs that are consistent with previous studies in other countries and different settings.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-MR8L6CTX-D
Correspondence to: 
 Dr D Aletaha, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; 
 Daniel.Aletaha@akh-wien.ac.at
href:annrheumdis-62-482.pdf
local:0620482
istex:2BF18306FDE59EEBB7BEBC040F37CACF1990EA2A
PMID:12695166
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.62.5.482