Toxicity profiles of traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis
Background: The progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be retarded or halted by disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Next to inefficacy, toxicity limits their use. Objective: To explore the toxicity profiles of DMARDs in daily life. Patients and methods: Five hundred and ninety thre...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 62; no. 5; pp. 482 - 486 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism
01.05.2003
BMJ BMJ Publishing Group Ltd BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: The progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be retarded or halted by disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Next to inefficacy, toxicity limits their use. Objective: To explore the toxicity profiles of DMARDs in daily life. Patients and methods: Five hundred and ninety three patients with RA charts (>2300 patient years of treatment) were reviewed at two rheumatology outpatient clinics. All recorded data on toxicity and reasons for stopping treatment were collected. Results: Adverse events were common reasons for treatment discontinuation (42% of treatments). In 70% they were subjectively reported at the clinical visit, while substantial laboratory abnormalities were seen relatively rarely (9% of treatments: abnormal liver function tests in 5%; haematological abnormalities in 3%; impaired renal function in 1%). No single case of retinopathy from antimalarial drugs (that is, an incidence of <0.3 events/1000 patient years) was found, although eye examinations by the specialists were abnormal 30 times per 1000 patient years, mostly revealing keratopathy. Most commonly reported symptoms per 1000 patient years were nausea (54 events), abdominal pain (37 events), and rashes (34 events). Adverse events were more likely to occur with increasing number of consecutive DMARD courses. Conclusion: The first DMARD course in a patient seems to be safer than the consecutive ones. In addition, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) seems to be similar for high and low dose treatment. Data are also provided on types and incidence of AEs that are consistent with previous studies in other countries and different settings. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/NVC-MR8L6CTX-D Correspondence to: Dr D Aletaha, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Daniel.Aletaha@akh-wien.ac.at href:annrheumdis-62-482.pdf local:0620482 istex:2BF18306FDE59EEBB7BEBC040F37CACF1990EA2A PMID:12695166 |
ISSN: | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
DOI: | 10.1136/ard.62.5.482 |