Ondasetron versus haloperidol for the treatment of postcardiotomy delirium: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study

To investigate the controlling efficacy of ondasetron and haloperidol in regard to the postcardiotomy delirium. We included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study 80 patients who developed delirium after heart surgery with the application of heart lung-machine. The patients were divid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cardiothoracic surgery Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 25
Main Authors Tagarakis, Georgios I, Voucharas, Christos, Tsolaki, Fani, Daskalopoulos, Marios E, Papaliagkas, Vassilios, Parisis, Charalampos, Gogaki, Eleni, Tsagalas, Iotalias, Sataitidis, Iotalias, Tsolaki, Magda, Tsilimingas, Nikolaos B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 21.03.2012
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To investigate the controlling efficacy of ondasetron and haloperidol in regard to the postcardiotomy delirium. We included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study 80 patients who developed delirium after heart surgery with the application of heart lung-machine. The patients were divided into two, equally-sized groups, which on detection of delirium received ondasetron 8 mg iv or haloperidol 5 mg iv respectively. The statistical analysis compared the baseline and demographic characteristics of the two groups (age, gender, comorbidities, years of education, type of surgery etc.). Both ondasetron and haloperidol had very good delirium controlling effects, without statistically significant differences. DISCUSSION-CONCLUSIONS: Ondasetron and haloperidol are efficient agents as far as the treatment of postcardiotomy delirium is concerned. As, in addition, ondasetron bares milder side-effects, we believe this could be the agent of choice in patients developing postcardiotomy delirium in the future.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1749-8090
1749-8090
DOI:10.1186/1749-8090-7-25