A meta-analysis of leukaemia risk from protracted exposure to low-dose gamma radiation

ContextMore than 400 000 workers annually receive a measurable radiation dose and may be at increased risk of radiation-induced leukaemia. It is unclear whether leukaemia risk is elevated with protracted, low-dose exposure.ObjectiveWe conducted a meta-analysis examining the relationship between prot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOccupational and Environmental Medicine Vol. 68; no. 6; pp. 457 - 464
Main Authors Daniels, R D, Schubauer-Berigan, M K
Format Journal Article Book Review
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.06.2011
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ContextMore than 400 000 workers annually receive a measurable radiation dose and may be at increased risk of radiation-induced leukaemia. It is unclear whether leukaemia risk is elevated with protracted, low-dose exposure.ObjectiveWe conducted a meta-analysis examining the relationship between protracted low-dose ionising radiation exposure and leukaemia.Data sourcesReviews by the National Academies and United Nations provided a summary of informative studies published before 2005. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for additional occupational and environmental studies published between 2005 and 2009.Study selectionWe selected 23 studies that: (1) examined the association between protracted exposures to ionising radiation and leukaemia excluding chronic lymphocytic subtype; (2) were a cohort or nested case–control design without major bias; (3) reported quantitative estimates of exposure; and (4) conducted exposure–response analyses using relative or excess RR per unit exposure.MethodsStudies were further screened to reduce information overlap. Random effects models were developed to summarise between-study variance and obtain an aggregate estimate of the excess RR at 100 mGy. Publication bias was assessed by trim and fill and Rosenthal's file drawer methods.ResultsWe found an ERR at 100 mGy of 0.19 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.32) by modelling results from 10 studies and adjusting for publication bias. Between-study variance was not evident (p=0.99).ConclusionsProtracted exposure to low-dose gamma radiation is significantly associated with leukaemia. Our estimate agreed well with the leukaemia risk observed among exposed adults in the Life Span Study (LSS) of atomic bomb survivors, providing increased confidence in the current understanding of leukaemia risk from ionising radiation. However, unlike the estimates obtained from the LSS, our model provides a precise, quantitative summary of the direct estimates of excess risk from studies of protracted radiation exposures.
Bibliography:istex:82479322A25F681BEC2734CE5830CE95D9325F1F
ark:/67375/NVC-BGQG290F-2
PMID:20935290
href:oemed-68-457.pdf
Related-article-href:10.1136/oemed-2011-100157
related-article-ID:RA1
local:oemed;68/6/457
ArticleID:oemed54684
See Editorial, p 387
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Disclaimer The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
ISSN:1351-0711
1470-7926
DOI:10.1136/oem.2009.054684