Adaptive robot training for the treatment of incoordination in Multiple Sclerosis

• Published in: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 37
• Main Authors: Vergaro, Elena, Squeri, Valentina, Brichetto, Giampaolo, Casadio, Maura, Morasso, Pietro, Solaro, Claudio, Sanguineti, Vittorio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 29.07.2010; BioMed Central Ltd; BMC
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Aged; Arm - physiopathology; Ataxia - complications; Ataxia - physiopathology; Ataxia - rehabilitation; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Biomedicine; Care and treatment; Cross-Over Studies; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Activity - physiology; Multiple sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - complications; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - physiopathology; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - rehabilitation; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - complications; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - physiopathology; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - rehabilitation; Neurology; Neuropsychological Tests; Neurosciences; Practice, Psychological; Rehabilitation Medicine; Robotics - methods; Robots; Time Factors; Training; Treatment Outcome; Italy; Multiple Sclerosis Subject; Stroke Subject; Training Mode; Expand Disability Status Scale; Cerebellar Symptom
• ISSN: 1743-0003; 1743-0003
• DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-37

Background Cerebellar symptoms are extremely disabling and are common in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) subjects. In this feasibility study, we developed and tested a robot therapy protocol, aimed at the rehabilitation of incoordination in MS subjects. Methods Eight subjects with clinically defined MS performed planar reaching movements while grasping the handle of a robotic manipulandum, which generated forces that either reduced (error-reducing, ER) or enhanced (error-enhancing, EE) the curvature of their movements, assessed at the beginning of each session. The protocol was designed to adapt to the individual subjects' impairments, as well as to improvements between sessions (if any). Each subject went through a total of eight training sessions. To compare the effect of the two variants of the training protocol (ER and EE), we used a cross-over design consisting of two blocks of sessions (four ER and four EE; 2 sessions/week), separated by a 2-weeks rest period. The order of application of ER and EE exercises was randomized across subjects. The primary outcome measure was the modification of the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) score. Other clinical scales and movement kinematics were taken as secondary outcomes. Results Most subjects revealed a preserved ability to adapt to the robot-generated forces. No significant differences were observed in EE and ER training. However over sessions, subjects exhibited an average 24% decrease in their NHPT score. The other clinical scales showed small improvements for at least some of the subjects. After training, movements became smoother, and their curvature decreased significantly over sessions. Conclusions The results point to an improved coordination over sessions and suggest a potential benefit of a short-term, customized, and adaptive robot therapy for MS subjects.