An exploration of risk for recurrent falls in two geriatric care settings

• Published in: BMC geriatrics Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 106
• Main Authors: Tariq, Humeira, Kloseck, Marita, Crilly, Richard G, Gutmanis, Iris, Gibson, Maggie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 10.10.2013; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Accidental Falls - prevention & control; Aged; Aged patients; Aged, 80 and over; Falls; Falls (Accidents); Female; Gait; Geriatric nursing; Geriatrics; Health aspects; Health sciences; Health Services for the Aged; Hospitals; Hospitals, Veterans; Humans; Information management; Injuries; Length of stay; Long term health care; Male; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Methods; Mobility; Older people; Ontario - epidemiology; Patients; Physiological aspects; Pilot Projects; Prevention; Quality control; Rehabilitation; Rehabilitation Centers; Risk Factors; Risk Management - methods; Secondary Prevention; Ontario; Canada; Ontario Canada
• ISSN: 1471-2318; 1471-2318
• DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-106

Fall events were examined in two distinct geriatric populations to identify factors associated with repeat fallers, and to examine whether patients who use gait aids, specifically a walker, were more likely to experience repeat falls. Each unit already had a generic program for falls prevention in place. Secondary data analysis was conducted on information collected during the pilot testing of a new quality assurance Incident Reporting Tool between October 2006 and September 2008. The study settings included an in-patient geriatric rehabilitation unit (GRU) and a long stay veterans' unit (LSVU) in a rehabilitation and long-stay hospital in Ontario. Participants were two hundred and twenty three individuals, aged 65 years or older on these two units, who experienced one or more fall incidents during the study period. Logistic regression analyses showed that on the GRU age was significantly associated with repeat falls. On the LSVU first falls in the morning or late evening were associated with repeat falling. Walker as a gait aid listed at time of first fall was not associated with repeat falls. This study suggests that different intervention may be necessary in different geriatric settings to identify, for secondary prevention, certain individuals for which the generic programs prove inadequate. Information collection with a specific focus on the issue of repeat falls may be necessary for greater insight.