Principlism and communitarianism

The decline in the interest in ethical theory is first outlined, as a background to the author’s discussion of principlism. The author’s own stance, that of a communitarian philosopher, is then described, before the subject of principlism itself is addressed. Two problems stand in the way of the aut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical ethics Vol. 29; no. 5; pp. 287 - 291
Main Author Callahan, D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics 01.10.2003
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The decline in the interest in ethical theory is first outlined, as a background to the author’s discussion of principlism. The author’s own stance, that of a communitarian philosopher, is then described, before the subject of principlism itself is addressed. Two problems stand in the way of the author’s embracing principlism: its individualistic bias and its capacity to block substantive ethical inquiry. The more serious problem the author finds to be its blocking function. Discussing the four scenarios the author finds that the utility of principlism is shown in the two scenarios about Jehovah’s Witnesses but that when it comes to selling kidneys for transplantation and germline enhancement, principlism is of little help.
Bibliography:PMID:14519838
istex:6E4E2DC93756FB31DEC682C67CEA282A65F0045A
Correspondence to:
 Professor D Callahan, The Hastings Center, 255 Elm Rd, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, USA; 
 callahan@thehastingscenter.org
ark:/67375/NVC-QB912MT6-S
local:0290287
href:medethics-29-287.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0306-6800
1473-4257
DOI:10.1136/jme.29.5.287