An epidemiological appraisal of the association between heart rate variability and particulate air pollution: a meta-analysis

ObjectiveStudies on the association between short-term exposure to ambient air pollution and heart rate variability (HRV) suggest that particulate matter (PM) exposure is associated with reductions in measures of HRV, but there is heterogeneity in the nature and magnitude of this association between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 98; no. 15; pp. 1127 - 1135
Main Authors Pieters, Nicky, Plusquin, Michelle, Cox, Bianca, Kicinski, Michal, Vangronsveld, Jaco, Nawrot, Tim S
Format Journal Article Book Review
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.08.2012
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectiveStudies on the association between short-term exposure to ambient air pollution and heart rate variability (HRV) suggest that particulate matter (PM) exposure is associated with reductions in measures of HRV, but there is heterogeneity in the nature and magnitude of this association between studies. The authors performed a meta-analysis to determine how consistent this association is.Data sourceThe authors searched the Pubmed citation database and Web of Knowledge to identify studies on HRV and PM.Study selectionOf the epidemiologic studies reviewed, 29 provided sufficient details to be considered. The meta-analysis included 18667 subjects recruited from the population in surveys, studies from patient groups, and from occupationally exposed groups.Data extractionTwo investigators read all papers and computerised all relevant information.ResultsThe authors computed pooled estimates from a random-effects model. In the combined studies, an increase of 10 μg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with significant reductions in the time-domain measurements, including low frequency (−1.66%, 95% CI −2.58% to −0.74%) and high frequency (−2.44%, 95% CI −3.76% to −1.12%) and in frequency-domain measurements, for SDNN (−0.12%, 95% CI −0.22% to −0.03%) and for rMSSD (−2.18%, 95% CI −3.33% to −1.03%). Funnel plots suggested that no publication bias was present and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of our combined estimates.ConclusionThe meta-analysis supports an inverse relationship between HRV, a marker for a worse cardiovascular prognosis, and particulate air pollution.
Bibliography:istex:66D2620DB9C643B154E82E3230142A2A89164A57
local:heartjnl;98/15/1127
ark:/67375/NVC-JB1107L3-H
PMID:22628541
ArticleID:heartjnl-2011-301505
href:heartjnl-98-1127.pdf
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301505