Preventing surgical complications: A survey on surgeons' perception of intra-articular malleolar screw misplacement in a cadaveric study

• Published in: Patient safety in surgery Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 24
• Main Authors: Giordano, Vincenzo, Gomes, Arthur Fs, Amaral, Ney P, Albuquerque, Rodrigo P, Pires, Robinson Es
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 04.10.2011; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Accuracy; Ankle; Biomedical materials; Cadaver; CD-ROM; Complications; Diagnosis; Diagnostic systems; Fracture; Fractures; Hardware; Health aspects; Injuries; Internal fixation in fractures; Legal medicine; Orthopedics; Penetration; Perception; Placement; Questionnaires; Screws; STARD; Surgeons; Surgery; Trauma; X-rays; Brazil
• ISSN: 1754-9493; 1754-9493
• DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-24

Intra-articular hardware penetration can occur during osteosynthesis of ankle fractures, jeopardizing patients' outcomes. The intraoperative recognition of misplaced screws may be difficult due to the challenge of adequate interpretation of specific radiographic views. The present study was designed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of standardized radiographic ankle views to determine the accuracy of diagnosis for intra-articular hardware placement of medial malleolar screws in a cadaveric model. Nine preserved human cadaveric lower extremity specimens were used. Under direct visualization, two 4.0 mm cancellous screws were inserted into the medial malleolus. Each specimen was analyzed radiographically using antero-posterior (AP) and mortise views. The X-rays were randomly uploaded on a CD-ROM and included in a survey submitted to ten selected orthopaedic surgeons. The "Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy" (STARD) questionnaire was used to determine the surgeons' perception of accuracy of screw placement in the medial malleolus. The selection of items was based on evidence whenever possible, therefore the "inconclusive" category was added. Inter and intraobserver variations were analyzed by kappa statistics to measure the amount of agreement. There was a poor level of agreement (kappa 0.4) both in the AP and in the mortise view among all the examiners. Associating the two x-rays, the agreement remained poor (kappa 0.4). In the cases in which there was a diagnosis of articular penetration, there was a poor agreement related to which of the screws was intra-articular. The number of "inconclusive" responses was low and constant, without a statistically significant difference between the subspecialists The routine intraoperative radiographic imaging of the ankle is difficult to interpret and unreliable for detection of intra-articular hardware penetration. We therefore recommend to reposition medial malleolar screws intraoperatively if there is any doubt regarding inadequate screw placement.