Monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors in early Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis of 17 randomised trials involving 3525 patients

Objective To quantify more reliably the benefits and risks of monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (MAOBIs) in early Parkinson's disease. Data sources Searches of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for years 1966-2003, plus major journals in the field, abstract boo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ Vol. 329; no. 7466; pp. 593 - 596
Main Authors Ives, Natalie J, Stowe, Rebecca L, Marro, Joanna, Counsell, Carl, Macleod, Angus, Clarke, Carl E, Gray, Richard, Wheatley, Keith
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London British Medical Journal Publishing Group 11.09.2004
British Medical Association
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
EditionInternational edition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To quantify more reliably the benefits and risks of monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (MAOBIs) in early Parkinson's disease. Data sources Searches of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for years 1966-2003, plus major journals in the field, abstract books, and proceedings of meetings, for randomised trials comparing MAOBIs with placebo or levodopa. Data extraction Available data on mortality, motor complications, side effects, treatment compliance, and clinician rated disability (for example, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale) were extracted from 17 trials and combined using standard meta-analytic methods. Results No significant difference in mortality existed between patients on MAOBIs and control patients (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.34; P = 0.2). Patients randomised to MAOBIs had significantly better total scores, motor scores, and activities of daily living scores on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale at three months compared with patients taking placebo; they were also less likely to need additional levodopa (0.57, 0.48 to 0.67; P < 0.00001) or to develop motor fluctuations (0.75, 0.59 to 0.95; P = 0.02). No difference existed between the two groups in the incidence of side effects or withdrawal of patients. Conclusions MAOBIs reduce disability, the need for levodopa, and the incidence of motor fluctuations, without substantial side effects or increased mortality. However, because few trials have compared MAOBIs with other antiparkinsonian drugs, uncertainty remains about the relative benefits and risks of MAOBIs. Further large, long term comparative trials that include patient rated quality of life measures are needed.
Bibliography:ArticleID:bmj.38184.606169.AE
PMID:15310558
ark:/67375/NVC-LRD0M5XX-P
Correspondence to: Natalie Ives
istex:271BF03B40C999EEC2641E2AA499CA3BD3A8391F
local:bmj;329/7466/593
href:bmj-329-593.pdf
Correspondence to: Natalie Ives n.j.ives@bham.ac.uk
One extra table and four extra figures are on bmj.com
Contributors: All authors contributed to the design, analysis, and interpretation of the study. NI is the guarantor.
Competing interests: NI, CEC, RG, and KW are organisers of the PD MED trial, which is funded by the NHS health technology assessment programme. CEC has received payments from the manufacturers of several of the drugs discussed for consultancy, lecture fees, and travel.
We recognise the work of all the original trial teams and the people who did the trials that contributed to this meta-analysis, and we thank the patients who agreed to help future patients by taking part in these trials.
Funding: This work was funded by the NHS Executive R&D. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the funding body.
Ethical approval: Not needed.
ISSN:0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.38184.606169.AE