Intravenous immunoglobulins in peripheral neuropathy associated with vasculitis

Background: Peripheral neuropathy is a prominent feature of the systemic and secondary vasculitides. Usually, it is responsive to corticosteroids, but in certain cases it may be resistant to corticosteroid or immunosuppressive treatment, or both. Objective: To present patients who exhibited various...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 62; no. 12; pp. 1221 - 1223
Main Authors Levy, Y, Uziel, Y, Zandman, G G, Amital, H, Sherer, Y, Langevitz, P, Goldman, B, Shoenfeld, Y
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.12.2003
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Peripheral neuropathy is a prominent feature of the systemic and secondary vasculitides. Usually, it is responsive to corticosteroids, but in certain cases it may be resistant to corticosteroid or immunosuppressive treatment, or both. Objective: To present patients who exhibited various inflammatory diseases accompanied with vasculitic peripheral neuropathies for which intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was used for treatment. Methods: Six patients with Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), vaccination induced vasculitis, Churg-Strauss vasculitis, mixed cryoglobulinaemia associated with hepatitis C infection, or sarcoidosis were included. All developed vasculitic peripheral neuropathy, and were treated with high dose IVIg (2 g/kg body weight). The patients were followed up for 1–5 years after this treatment. Results: In four patients (Sjögren’s syndrome, Churg-Strauss vasculitis, SLE, and vaccination induced vasculitis) the neuropathy resolved after IVIg treatment. Conclusion: IVIg may be beneficial in cases of resistant vasculitic peripheral neuropathy. IVIg should probably be considered as a sole or adjuvant treatment for patients with contraindications to conventional treatment, or alternatively, for patients in whom conventional treatment has failed.
Bibliography:local:0621221
href:annrheumdis-62-1221.pdf
istex:FEF94E90893B2E815C3DA931771004FE3887240E
Correspondence to:
 Professor Y Shoenfeld
 Department of Medicine “B”, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Israel; shoenfel@post.tau.ac.il
PMID:14644864
ark:/67375/NVC-FK3MGRLW-6
ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2002.003996