Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function

• Published in: Cardiovascular ultrasound Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 27
• Main Authors: Cosyns, Bernard, Haberman, David, Droogmans, Steven, Warzée, Sandrine, Mahieu, Philippe, Laurent, Eric, Moonen, Marie, Hernot, Sophie, Lancellotti, Patrizio
• Format: Journal Article Web Resource
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 16.06.2009; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aged; Contrast Media; Coronary Artery Disease - complications; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods; Female; General & internal medicine; Human health sciences; Humans; Male; Médecine générale & interne; Phospholipids; Radiopharmaceuticals; Reproducibility of Results; Sciences de la santé humaine; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sulfur Hexafluoride; Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi; Technical Notes; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging
• ISSN: 1476-7120; 1476-7120
• DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-7-27

In clinical practice and in clinical trials, echocardiography and scintigraphy are used the most for the evaluation of global left ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular (LV) volumes. Actually, poor quality imaging and geometrical assumptions are the main limitations of LVEF measured by echocardiography. Contrast agents and 3D echocardiography are new methods that may alleviate these potential limitations. Therefore we sought to examine the accuracy of contrast 3D echocardiography for the evaluation of LV volumes and LVEF relative to MIBI gated SPECT as an independent reference. In 43 patients addressed for chest pain, contrast 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) and MIBI gated SPECT were prospectively performed on the same day. The accuracy and the variability of LV volumes and LVEF measurements were evaluated. Due to good endocardial delineation, LV volumes and LVEF measurements by contrast RT3DE were feasible in 99% of the patients. The mean LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) of the group by scintigraphy was 143 +/- 65 mL and was underestimated by triplane contrast RT3DE (128 +/- 60 mL; p < 0.001) and less by full-volume contrast RT3DE (132 +/- 62 mL; p < 0.001). Limits of agreement with scintigraphy were similar for triplane andfull-volume, modalities with the best results for full-volume. Results were similar for calculation of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). The mean LVEF was 44 +/- 16% with scintigraphy and was not significantly different with both triplane contrast RT3DE (45 +/- 15%) and full-volume contrast RT3DE (45 +/- 15%). There was an excellent correlation between two different observers for LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF measurements and inter observer agreement was also good for both contrast RT3DE techniques. Contrast RT3DE allows an accurate assessment of LVEF compared to the LVEF measured by SPECT, and shows low variability between observers. Although RT3DE triplane provides accurate evaluation of left ventricular function, RT3DE full-volume is superior to triplane modality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.