Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial

Background Long-term immunosuppressive treatment does not efficiently prevent relapses of lupus nephritis (LN). This investigator-initiated randomised trial tested whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was superior to azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance treatment. Methods A total of 105 patients with lu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 69; no. 12; pp. 2083 - 2089
Main Authors Houssiau, Frédéric A, D'Cruz, David, Sangle, Shirish, Remy, Philippe, Vasconcelos, Carlos, Petrovic, Radmila, Fiehn, Christoph, de Ramon Garrido, Enrique, Gilboe, Inge-Magrethe, Tektonidou, Maria, Blockmans, Daniel, Ravelingien, Isabelle, le Guern, Véronique, Depresseux, Geneviève, Guillevin, Loïc, Cervera, Ricard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.12.2010
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
SeriesExtended report
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Long-term immunosuppressive treatment does not efficiently prevent relapses of lupus nephritis (LN). This investigator-initiated randomised trial tested whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was superior to azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance treatment. Methods A total of 105 patients with lupus with proliferative LN were included. All received three daily intravenous pulses of 750 mg methylprednisolone, followed by oral glucocorticoids and six fortnightly cyclophosphamide intravenous pulses of 500 mg. Based on randomisation performed at baseline, AZA (target dose: 2 mg/kg/day) or MMF (target dose: 2 g/day) was given at week 12. Analyses were by intent to treat. Time to renal flare was the primary end point. Mean (SD) follow-up of the intent-to-treat population was 48 (14) months. Results The baseline clinical, biological and pathological characteristics of patients allocated to AZA or MMF did not differ. Renal flares were observed in 13 (25%) AZA-treated and 10 (19%) MMF-treated patients. Time to renal flare, to severe systemic flare, to benign flare and to renal remission did not statistically differ. Over a 3-year period, 24 h proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum albumin, serum C3, haemoglobin and global disease activity scores improved similarly in both groups. Doubling of serum creatinine occurred in four AZA-treated and three MMF-treated patients. Adverse events did not differ between the groups except for haematological cytopenias, which were statistically more frequent in the AZA group (p=0.03) but led only one patient to drop out. Conclusions Fewer renal flares were observed in patients receiving MMF but the difference did not reach statistical significance.
Bibliography:istex:83B8AA09AC684A52EE0D1CD0D87E85DA2BDB43F9
PMID:20833738
href:annrheumdis-69-2083.pdf
local:annrheumdis;69/12/2083
ark:/67375/NVC-N2FSW9DT-0
ArticleID:annrheumdis131995
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2010.131995