Improving the quality of palliative care for ambulatory patients with lung cancer
Problem Most patients with advanced lung cancer currently receive much of their health care, including chemotherapy, as outpatients. Patients have to deal with the complex and time consuming logistics of ambulatory cancer care. At the same time, members of staff often waste considerable time and ene...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ Vol. 330; no. 7503; pp. 1309 - 1313 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
04.06.2005
British Medical Association BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group BMJ Publishing Group Ltd |
Edition | International edition |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Problem Most patients with advanced lung cancer currently receive much of their health care, including chemotherapy, as outpatients. Patients have to deal with the complex and time consuming logistics of ambulatory cancer care. At the same time, members of staff often waste considerable time and energy in organisational aspects of care that could be better used in direct interaction with patients. Design Quality improvement study using direct observation and run and flow charts, and focus group meetings with patients and families regarding perceptions of the clinic and with staff regarding satisfaction with working conditions. Setting Thoracic oncology outpatient clinic at a Norwegian university hospital where patients receive chemotherapy and complementary palliative care. Key measures for improvement Waiting time and time wasted during consultations; calmer working situation at the clinic; satisfaction among patients. Strategies for change Rescheduled patients' appointments, automated retrieval of blood test results, systematic reporting in patients' files, design of an information leaflet, and refurnishing of the waiting area at the clinic. Effects of change Interventions resulted in increased satisfaction for patients and staff, reduced waiting time, and reduced variability of waiting time. Lessons learnt Direct observation, focus groups, questionnaires on patients' satisfaction, and measurement of process time were useful in systematically improving care in this outpatient clinic. The description of this experience can serve as an example for the improvement of a microsystem, particularly in other settings with similar problems. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:bmj.330.7503.1309 istex:A0FA19A9720FB34D20ED0C7885E673E73CF323D0 PMID:15933354 ark:/67375/NVC-Q4P05C53-R Correspondence to: C von Plessen local:bmj;330/7503/1309 href:bmj-330-1309.pdf ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 We thank Frank Davidoff for his constructive reviewing of the manuscript, Gene Nelson for contributing ideas, Kerstin vonPlessen for detailed comments, and Alf Andreassen for supporting the project in the department of thoracic medicine. Contributors: CvP developed the project, wrote the paper, and is guarantor. AA guided the design of the project and reviewed the manuscript. Ethical approval: The protocol was presented to the local ethical research committee and a formal review was not deemed necessary. Correspondence to: C von Plessen christian.von.plessen@helse-bergen.no Competing interests: Astra-Zeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer have supported CvP to attend conferences on thoracic medicine. He is currently investigator in clinical studies initiated by AstraZeneca and ElyLilly. AA has received funding from the Norwegian Cancer Society and Medirad. Funding: The project was supported by the Quality Improvement Fund of the Norwegian Medical Association. The Norwegian Heart and Lung Foundation sponsored new furniture for the waiting area at the clinic. |
ISSN: | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1309 |