Improve definition of titanium tandems in MR-guided high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer using proton density weighted MRI

• Published in: Radiation oncology (London, England) Vol. 8; no. 1; p. 16
• Main Authors: Hu, Yanle, Esthappan, Jacqueline, Mutic, Sasa, Richardson, Susan, Gay, Hiram A, Schwarz, Julie K, Grigsby, Perry W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 17.01.2013; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Brachytherapy; Care and treatment; Cervical cancer; Diagnosis; Female; HDR Brachytherapy; Health aspects; Humans; Image Enhancement; Ionizing radiation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Middle Aged; MRI; Prognosis; Proton density weighting; Protons - therapeutic use; Radioisotope brachytherapy; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided; Retrospective Studies; T2 weighting; Titanium; Titanium - chemistry; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy
• ISSN: 1748-717X; 1748-717X
• DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-16

For cervical cancer patients treated with MR-guided high dose rate brachytherapy, the accuracy of radiation delivery depends on accurate localization of both tumors and the applicator, e.g. tandem and ovoid. Standard T2-weighted (T2W) MRI has good tumor-tissue contrast. However, it suffers from poor uterus-tandem contrast, which makes the tandem delineation very challenging. In this study, we evaluated the possibility of using proton density weighted (PDW) MRI to improve the definition of titanium tandems. Both T2W and PDW MRI images were obtained from each cervical cancer patient. Imaging parameters were kept the same between the T2W and PDW sequences for each patient except the echo time (90 ms for T2W and 5.5 ms for PDW) and the slice thickness (0.5 cm for T2W and 0.25 cm for PDW). Uterus-tandem contrast was calculated by the equation C=(Su-St)/Su, where Su and St represented the average signal in the uterus and the tandem, respectively. The diameter of the tandem was measured 1.5 cm away from the tip of the tandem. The tandem was segmented by the histogram thresholding technique. PDW MRI could significantly improve the uterus-tandem contrast compared to T2W MRI (0.42±0.24 for T2W MRI, 0.77±0.14 for PDW MRI, p=0.0002). The average difference between the measured and physical diameters of the tandem was reduced from 0.20±0.15 cm by using T2W MRI to 0.10±0.11 cm by using PDW MRI (p=0.0003). The tandem segmented from the PDW image looked more uniform and complete compared to that from the T2W image. Compared to the standard T2W MRI, PDW MRI has better uterus-tandem contrast. The information provided by PDW MRI is complementary to those provided by T2W MRI. Therefore, we recommend adding PDW MRI to the simulation protocol to assist tandem delineation process for cervical cancer patients.