Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation

Only two (5%) of the new pages adhered to the guidelines for quality of content compared with three (8%) of the original pages. However, 18 (45%) of the new pages compared with only three (8%) of the original pages adhered to most of the guidelines, except for one indication.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ Vol. 324; no. 7337; pp. 582 - 583
Main Authors Pandolfini, Chiara, Bonati, Maurizio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London British Medical Journal Publishing Group 09.03.2002
British Medical Association
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ
EditionInternational edition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Only two (5%) of the new pages adhered to the guidelines for quality of content compared with three (8%) of the original pages. However, 18 (45%) of the new pages compared with only three (8%) of the original pages adhered to most of the guidelines, except for one indication.
Bibliography:istex:84E685753A177128D6D13BD15E7D003A97CA89D0
ArticleID:bmj.324.7337.582
PMID:11884324
local:bmj;324/7337/582
Correspondence to: C Pandolfini
ark:/67375/NVC-SKX907QN-D
href:bmj-324-582.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Correspondence to: C Pandolfini chiara@marionegri.it
Contributors: CP was primarily responsible for data entry, management, and analysis; she will act as guarantor for the paper. MB guided the analyses. CP and MB contributed equally to writing the manuscript.
ISSN:0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.324.7337.582