Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation
Only two (5%) of the new pages adhered to the guidelines for quality of content compared with three (8%) of the original pages. However, 18 (45%) of the new pages compared with only three (8%) of the original pages adhered to most of the guidelines, except for one indication.
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ Vol. 324; no. 7337; pp. 582 - 583 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
09.03.2002
British Medical Association BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group BMJ |
Edition | International edition |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Only two (5%) of the new pages adhered to the guidelines for quality of content compared with three (8%) of the original pages. However, 18 (45%) of the new pages compared with only three (8%) of the original pages adhered to most of the guidelines, except for one indication. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:84E685753A177128D6D13BD15E7D003A97CA89D0 ArticleID:bmj.324.7337.582 PMID:11884324 local:bmj;324/7337/582 Correspondence to: C Pandolfini ark:/67375/NVC-SKX907QN-D href:bmj-324-582.pdf ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Correspondence to: C Pandolfini chiara@marionegri.it Contributors: CP was primarily responsible for data entry, management, and analysis; she will act as guarantor for the paper. MB guided the analyses. CP and MB contributed equally to writing the manuscript. |
ISSN: | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.582 |