Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in London 1995–7 showing low rate of active transmission

Background: Tuberculosis notification rates for London have risen dramatically in recent years. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has contributed to our understanding of the epidemiology of tuberculosis throughout the world. This study aimed to assess the degree of recent transmission o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThorax Vol. 57; no. 7; pp. 617 - 622
Main Authors Maguire, H, Dale, J W, McHugh, T D, Butcher, P D, Gillespie, S H, Costetsos, A, Al-Ghusein, H, Holland, R, Dickens, A, Marston, L, Wilson, P, Pitman, R, Strachan, D, Drobniewski, F A, Banerjee, D K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society 01.07.2002
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Tuberculosis notification rates for London have risen dramatically in recent years. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has contributed to our understanding of the epidemiology of tuberculosis throughout the world. This study aimed to assess the degree of recent transmission of M tuberculosis in London and subpopulations of the community with high rates of recent transmission. Methods:M tuberculosis isolates from all persons from Greater London diagnosed with culture positive tuberculosis between 1 July 1995 and 31 December 1997 were genetically fingerprinted using IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing. A structured proforma was used during record review of cases of culture confirmed tuberculosis. Cluster analysis was performed and risk factors for clustering were examined in a univariate analysis followed by a logistic regression analysis with membership of a cluster as the outcome variable. Results: RFLP patterns were obtained for 2042 isolates with more than four copies of IS6110; 463 (22.7%) belonged to 169 molecular clusters, which ranged in size from two (65% of clusters) to 12 persons. The estimated rate of recent transmission was 14.4%. Young age (0–19 years) (odds ratio (OR) 2.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 to 4.44), birth in the UK (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.03), black Caribbean ethnic group (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.16), alcohol dependence (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.72), and streptomycin resistance (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.88) were independently associated with an increased risk of clustering. Conclusions: Tuberculosis in London is largely caused by reactivation or importation of infection by recent immigrants. Newly acquired infection is also common among people with recognised risk factors. Preventative interventions and early diagnosis of immigrants from areas with a high incidence of tuberculosis, together with thorough contact tracing and monitoring of treatment outcome among all cases of tuberculosis (especially in groups at higher risk of recent infection), remains most important.
Bibliography:local:0570617
ark:/67375/NVC-ML5VLQSD-4
href:thoraxjnl-57-617.pdf
istex:2652FE5B25B12ECA1E7527DE68EDF774A1180140
Correspondence to:
 Dr T D McHugh, Department of Medical Microbiology, Royal Free & University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London NW3 2PF, UK;
 tmchugh@rfc.ucl.ac.uk
PMID:12096206
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0040-6376
1468-3296
DOI:10.1136/thorax.57.7.617