Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers
Background: Increasing collaboration between industrialised and developing countries in human research studies has led to concerns regarding the potential exploitation of resource deprived countries. This study, commissioned by the former National Bioethics Advisory Commission of the United States,...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of medical ethics Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 68 - 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics
01.02.2004
BMJ Publishing Group BMJ Publishing Group Ltd BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Increasing collaboration between industrialised and developing countries in human research studies has led to concerns regarding the potential exploitation of resource deprived countries. This study, commissioned by the former National Bioethics Advisory Commission of the United States, surveyed developing country researchers about their concerns and opinions regarding ethical review processes and the performance of developing country and US international review boards (IRBs). Methods: Contact lists from four international organisations were used to identify and survey 670 health researchers in developing countries. A questionnaire with 169 questions explored issues of IRB review, informed consent, and recommendations. Results: The majority of the developing country researchers were middle aged males who were physicians and were employed by educational institutions, carrying out research on part time basis. Forty four percent of the respondents reported that their studies were not reviewed by a developing country IRB or Ministry of Health and one third of these studies were funded by the US. During the review process issues such as the need for local language consent forms and letters for approval, and confidentiality protection of participants were raised by US IRBs in significantly higher proportions than by host country IRBs. Conclusion: This survey indicates the need for the ethical review of collaborative research in both US and host countries. It also reflects a desire for focused capacity development in supporting ethical review of research. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Correspondence to:
A Hyder
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N Wolfe St, E-8132 Baltimore, MD, USA; ahyder@jhsph.edu PMID:14872079 local:0300068 ark:/67375/NVC-82KR1P0G-X istex:99B982C99790530394099DEA532E0A31A4641B7F href:medethics-30-68.pdf ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0306-6800 1473-4257 |
DOI: | 10.1136/jme.2002.001933 |