Population based study of early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: implications for public education and organisation of services
Abstract Objective To estimate the very early stroke risk after a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke and thereby inform the planning of effective stroke prevention services. Design Population based prospective cohort study of patients with TIA or stroke. Setting Nine general practices...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ Vol. 328; no. 7435; pp. 326 - 328 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
07.02.2004
BMJ Publishing Group British Medical Association BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd |
Edition | International edition |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective To estimate the very early stroke risk after a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke and thereby inform the planning of effective stroke prevention services. Design Population based prospective cohort study of patients with TIA or stroke. Setting Nine general practices in Oxfordshire, England, from April 2002 to April 2003. Participants All patients who had a TIA (n = 87) or minor stroke (n = 87) during the study period and who presented to medical attention. Main outcome measures Risk of recurrent stroke at seven days, one month, and three months after TIAs and minor strokes. Results The estimated risk of recurrent stroke was 8.0% (95% confidence interval 2.3% to 13.7%) at seven days, 11.5% (4.8% to 18.2%) at one month, and 17.3% (9.3% to 25.3%) at three months after a TIA. The risks at these three time periods after a minor stroke were 11.5% (4.8% to 11.2%), 15.0% (7.5% to 22.5%), and 18.5% (10.3% to 26.7%). Conclusions The early risks of stroke after a TIA or minor stroke are much higher than commonly quoted. More research is needed to determine whether these risks can be reduced by more rapid instigation of preventive treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:bmj.37991.635266.44 Correspondence to: P M Rothwell istex:91A28058A9B167C91F8BA7624AC5487F28AA329C local:bmj;328/7435/326 ark:/67375/NVC-S2WVVMX0-1 href:bmj-328-326.pdf PMID:14744823 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 We thank everyone who helped with this project, particularly M Giles (study physician), P Edwards (study administrator), and L Silver and L Bull (study nurses). We especially thank the participating general practitioners. The participating general practices were (name of liaison partner from each practice only): M Raine (19 Beaumont Road, Oxford), T Nicholson-Lailey (East Oxford Health Centre, Oxford), H Hoy (Health Centre, Berinsfield), D Otterburn (Malthouse Surgery, Abingdon), S Street (Exeter Surgery, Kidlington), D Evans (Kidlington and Yarnton Medical Group, Kidlington), M Drury (Church Street, Wantage), M Robertson (Marcham Road Family Health Centre, Abingdon), and P Buttar (Abingdon Surgery, Abingdon). AJC collected the data, assisted in the study design and data analysis, and drafted the paper. JKL analysed the data, assisted with data collection, and drafted the paper. PMR had the original idea, designed the study, assisted with data collection and in drafting the manuscript, and is the guarantor. As guarantor, PMR accepts full responsibility for the conduct of the study, has access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. Correspondence to: P M Rothwell peter.rothwell@clneuro.ox.ac.uk Competing interests: None declared Funding: The first year of the Oxford vascular study was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council and the Stroke Association. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Oxfordshire clinical research ethics committee (C0.043). |
ISSN: | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.37991.635266.44 |