Optimisation of acid fast smears for the direct detection of mycobacteria in clinical samples
Aims: Despite its long history, the acid fast smear remains unstandardised. Technical variations in both the preparation of clinical material and subsequent staining mean that smear sensitivity relative to culture may vary from 50% to over 80%. This study assessed the sensitivity of acid fast micros...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical pathology Vol. 56; no. 8; pp. 613 - 615 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists
01.08.2003
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd BMJ Publishing Group LTD Copyright 2003 Journal of Clinical Pathology |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aims: Despite its long history, the acid fast smear remains unstandardised. Technical variations in both the preparation of clinical material and subsequent staining mean that smear sensitivity relative to culture may vary from 50% to over 80%. This study assessed the sensitivity of acid fast microscopy at each of five stages of sample preparation and by both commonly used staining methods. Methods: Sputum samples thought for varying reasons to be highly likely to be culture positive were used to prepare a series of smears in which the effects of digestion (liquefaction), concentration (centrifugation), and decontamination (sodium hydroxide) could be assessed, together with a comparison of staining by the auramine/phenol and Ziehl-Neelsen techniques. Results: The most effective method for the demonstration of acid fast organisms in sputum was found to be an auramine phenol stain applied to a liquefied, concentrated sample and examined before the decontamination process. Conclusions: The auramine phenol stain applied to a liquefied, concentrated sample and examined before the decontamination process is the most effective method for the demonstration of acid fast organisms in sputum. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | href:jclinpath-56-613.pdf ark:/67375/NVC-KDWCQJC6-T istex:7C0CB5011B72672D1885EB7AD8ABC833CDEB5237 local:0560613 Correspondence to: Dr J G Magee, Regional Centre for Mycobacteriology, Public Health Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK; newjmage@north.phls.nhs.uk PMID:12890813 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Correspondence to: Dr J G Magee, Regional Centre for Mycobacteriology, Public Health Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK; newjmage@north.phls.nhs.uk |
ISSN: | 0021-9746 1472-4146 |
DOI: | 10.1136/jcp.56.8.613 |