The normal response to prolonged passive head up tilt testing
OBJECTIVE To define the responses to head up tilt in a large group of normal adult subjects using the most widely employed protocol for tilt testing. METHODS 127 normal subjects aged 19–88 years (mean (SD), 49 (20) years) without a previous history of syncope underwent tilt testing at 60° for 45 min...
Saved in:
Published in | Heart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 84; no. 5; pp. 509 - 514 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society
01.11.2000
BMJ BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | OBJECTIVE To define the responses to head up tilt in a large group of normal adult subjects using the most widely employed protocol for tilt testing. METHODS 127 normal subjects aged 19–88 years (mean (SD), 49 (20) years) without a previous history of syncope underwent tilt testing at 60° for 45 minutes or until syncope intervened. Blood pressure monitoring was performed with digital photoplethysmography, providing continuous, non-invasive, beat to beat heart rate and pressure measurements. RESULTS 13% of subjects developed vasovagal syncope after a mean (SD) tilt time of 31.7 (12.4) minutes (range 8.5–44.9 minutes). Severe cardioinhibition during syncope was observed less often than is reported in patients investigated for syncope. There were no differences in the age or sex distributions of subjects with positive or negative outcomes, or in the proportions with cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor vasovagal syncope compared with previously reported patient populations. Subjects with negative outcomes showed age related differences in heart rate and blood pressure behaviour throughout tilt. CONCLUSIONS False positive results with tilting appear to be common. This has important implications for the use of diagnostic tilt testing. The magnitude of the heart rate and blood pressure changes observed during negative tilts largely invalidates previously suggested criteria for abnormal non-syncopal outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:2592920491E7F2FD7A8D030954268DFEC48A49DC ark:/67375/NVC-0MH0MJL5-X href:heartjnl-84-509.pdf PMID:11040011 local:heartjnl;84/5/509 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1355-6037 1468-201X |
DOI: | 10.1136/heart.84.5.509 |