Family incidence of endometriosis in first-, second-, and third-degree relatives: case-control study

• Published in: Reproductive biology and endocrinology Vol. 8; no. 1; p. 85
• Main Authors: Nouri, Kazem, Ott, Johannes, Krupitz, Birgitt, Huber, Johannes C, Wenzl, Rene
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 11.07.2010; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Care and treatment; Case-Control Studies; Diagnosis; Endometriosis; Endometriosis - epidemiology; Family; Family Health; Female; Genetic aspects; Humans; Incidence; Middle Aged; Ovarian Diseases - epidemiology; Retrospective Studies; Risk factors
• ISSN: 1477-7827; 1477-7827
• DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-85

Initial publications examining the hereditary aspects of endometriosis appeared in the early seventies and demonstrated an up to seven-fold risk for endometriosis in first-degree relatives of endometriosis patients. The aim was to evaluate the influence of hereditary aspects on the endometriosis risk in our patient collective. In a retrospective cohort study we evaluated the incidence of endometriosis among first-, second-, and third-degree relatives of endometriosis patients and compare it with its incidence among first-, second-, and third-degree relatives of patients without endometriosis. Eighty patients in whom endometriosis had been confirmed laparoscopically and histologically by biopsy and 60 patients in whom no endometriosis had been found during laparoscopy were given a questionnaire about the presence of symptoms associated with endometriosis and its family incidence. Patients of both the endometriosis and the control group were 37.7 +/- 6.2 and 45.9 +/- 12.0 years of age at the time of the interview, respectively (p < 0.05). Information about the presence of endometriosis was more readily available for relatives of those in the endometriosis group than for those in the control group (325/749 [43.4%] vs. 239/425 [56.2%], p < 0.05). In 5/136 (3.7%) and 8/134 (6.0%) first-degree relatives of endometriosis patients and the control group, respectively, information about the presence of endometriosis was not available (p = 0.554). Endometriosis was found in 8/136 (5.9%) first-degree relatives of patients and in 4/134 (3.0%) first-degree relatives of controls in the real-case analysis (p = 0.248). When comparing endometriosis characteristics between endometriosis patients with and without a history of familial endometriosis, no significant differences were found. There is a trend toward an increased familial incidence of endometriosis. In contrast to the literature, we found a less dramatic increase in familial risk for the development of endometriosis.