Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 9; no. 12; p. e033084
• Main Authors: Ni, Jin-Rong, Yan, Pei-Jing, Liu, Shi-Dong, Hu, Yuan, Yang, Ke-Hu, Song, Bing, Lei, Jun-Qiang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 22.12.2019; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Subjects: Accuracy; Adult; Aged; Clinical trials; Collaboration; diagnostic radiology; Diagnostics; echocardiography; Echocardiography - standards; Female; Humans; hypertension; Hypertension, Pulmonary - diagnosis; Lung diseases; Male; Medical diagnosis; Meta-analysis; Middle Aged; Population; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pulmonary arteries; Pulmonary hypertension; Quality; Sensitivity analysis; Software; Statistical analysis; Systematic review; United Kingdom > UK; Iran; United States > US; Germany; hypertension; echocardiography; diagnostic radiology
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033084

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources and eligibility criteriaEmbase, Cochrane Library for clinical trials, PubMed and Web of Science were used to search studies from inception to 19 June, 2019. Studies using both TTE and right heart catheterisation (RHC) to diagnose PH were included.Main resultsA total of 27 studies involving 4386 subjects were considered as eligible for analysis. TTE had a pooled sensitivity of 85%, a pooled specificity of 74%, a pooled positive likelihood ratio of 3.2, a pooled negative likelihood ratio of 0.20, a pooled diagnostic OR of 16 and finally an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88. The subgroup with the shortest time interval between TTE and RHC had the best diagnostic effect, with sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 88%, 90% and 0.94, respectively. TTE had lower sensitivity (81%), specificity (61%) and AUC (0.73) in the subgroup of patients with definite lung diseases. Subgroup analysis also showed that different thresholds of TTE resulted in a different diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of PH.ConclusionTTE has a clinical value in diagnosing PH, although it cannot yet replace RHC considered as the gold standard. The accuracy of TTE may be improved by shortening the time interval between TTE and RHC and by developing an appropriate threshold. TTE may not be suitable to assess pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with pulmonary diseases.PROSPERO registration numberPROSPERO CRD42019123289.