New approaches to preventing restenosis

Year and procedure Indications Restenosis rate (%) New problem Solution 1977-87: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Simple lesions, chronic syndromes 30-50 Restenosis, subacute closure Stent 1988-92: - - - - Newer devices-Rotablater, excimer laser coronary angioplasty, directional corona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ Vol. 327; no. 7409; pp. 274 - 279
Main Authors Bhargava, Balram, Karthikeyan, Ganesan, Abizaid, Alexandre S, Mehran, Roxana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London British Medical Journal Publishing Group 02.08.2003
British Medical Association
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Group
EditionInternational edition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Year and procedure Indications Restenosis rate (%) New problem Solution 1977-87: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Simple lesions, chronic syndromes 30-50 Restenosis, subacute closure Stent 1988-92: - - - - Newer devices-Rotablater, excimer laser coronary angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy Complex, calcific, tortuous, bifurcations, left main, multiple lesions 50 Restenosis; restenosis 50-70% Intravascular ultrasound guided use Stents Acute coronary syndromes 20-30 Restenosis, subacute thrombosis, instent restenosis High pressure, anticoagulation 1993-2002: newer stents (biodegradable, covered, radioactive, intravascular ultrasonography) Carotids, iliacs, renals, saphenous vein grafts, abdominal aortic aneurysms direct, rupture 10-20 Instent restenosis, re-restenosis 50-70% Improved designs and material, radiation 1995-2002: brachytherapy-photodynamic therapy, ultrasonography, cryotherapy, cutting balloon Instent restenosis <10 Restenosis, re-restenosis 10% late thrombosis, edge failure, geographical miss Prolonged antiplatelets 2002: eluting stents-drugs, gene Simple lesions, chronic syndromes, some complex lesions 0-5 ? Summary points Restenosis is a common problem after percutaneous coronary interventions, depending on patient characteristics, lesion morphology, and the type of intervention Coronary stenting is the only intervention that has reliably and consistently reduced restenosis in coronary lesions Near zero per cent restenosis rates have recently been achieved with antiproliferative drug eluting coronary stents Recurrent stenosis after treatment of instent restenosis is common Adjuvant treatment with intracoronary [GAMMA] and β radiation is the most effective currently available means to prevent recurrent stenosis after the treatment of instent restenosis Modifying gene expression using antisense therapies or gene transfer will play an important part in the prevention of restenosis Box 1 Evolution of percutaneous interventions Phase 1 (1977-87): simple balloon angioplasty Phase 2 (1988-92): new device angioplasty Phase 3 (1993-2002): stent revolution Clinically significant restenosis generally occurs between one and three months after balloon angioplasty.
Bibliography:href:bmj-327-274.pdf
Correspondence to: B Bhargava
ArticleID:bmj.327.7409.274
istex:3959723D93B2F8037C42F4C3AD82F5C3C299B8B3
local:bmj;327/7409/274
PMID:12896943
ark:/67375/NVC-D504Z19N-S
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Funding: None declared.
Contributors: All authors were involved in the preparation of the manuscript and in the revision process. BB will act as guarantor.
Additional web references (w1-w53) and tables appear on bmj.com
Competing interests: None declared.
ISSN:0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7409.274