Diagnostic yield of push-type enteroscopy in relation to indication

Background—Push-type enteroscopy, a recent method for investigating the small intestine, is currently undergoing assessment. Its diagnostic yield varies in the studies reported to date. Aim—To assess the diagnostic value of push-type enteroscopy according to indication. Patients and methods—From Jan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 421 - 425
Main Authors Landi, B, Tkoub, M, Gaudric, M, Guimbaud, R, Cervoni, J P, Chaussade, S, Couturier, D, Barbier, J P, Cellier, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 01.03.1998
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background—Push-type enteroscopy, a recent method for investigating the small intestine, is currently undergoing assessment. Its diagnostic yield varies in the studies reported to date. Aim—To assess the diagnostic value of push-type enteroscopy according to indication. Patients and methods—From January 1994 to September 1995, 152 consecutive patients (mean age 34 years) underwent push-type enteroscopy (jejunoscopy, n=93; retrograde ileoscopy, n=17; and double way enteroscopy, n=42). The indications were: unexplained iron deficiency anaemia or macroscopic gastrointestinal bleeding (n=76), radiological abnormalities of the small intestine (n=23), chronic diarrhoea and/or malabsorption syndrome (n=18), abdominal pain (n=12), and miscellaneous (n=23). All patients had undergone previous negative aetiological investigations. Results—The jejunum and ileum were explored through 120 cm (30–160 cm) and 60 cm (20–120 cm). Digestive bleeding: lesions of the small bowel were found in 6% of the patients with isolated iron deficiency anaemia and 20% of patients with patent digestive haemorrhage. Radiological abnormalities of the small intestine: push-type enteroscopy provided a diagnosis or modified the interpretation of radiological findings in 18/23 cases (78%). Chronic diarrhoea and/or malabsorption: push-type enteroscopy yielded explanatory findings in four cases (22%). Abdominal pain: push-type enteroscopy provided no diagnosis. Conclusion—In this series, push-type enteroscopy was of particular value in investigating patients with radiological abnormalities of the small intestine. It was of some value in the exploration of patent digestive haemorrhage or chronic diarrhoea, but not of abdominal pain. Its value was limited in the exploration of iron deficiency anaemia.
Bibliography:Dr B Landi, Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Laennec, 42 Rue de Sèvres, 75007 Paris, France.
ark:/67375/NVC-L5J942K8-P
local:gutjnl;42/3/421
href:gutjnl-42-421.pdf
PMID:9577352
istex:A5449415CCCB3620CB1035D877BF660F30A933C8
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
1458-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.42.3.421